PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAV vs. USMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAV vs. USMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 3.34% return. Over the past 10 years, EFAV has underperformed USMV with an annualized return of 6.33%, while USMV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.44% annualized return.


EFAV

1D
0.88%
1M
3.93%
6M
6.18%
YTD
7.56%
1Y
13.34%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*
6.33%

USMV

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.07%
6M
3.05%
YTD
3.34%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAV vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
7.56%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-5.74%22.24%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
3.34%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%18.91%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAV and USMV is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between EFAV and USMV has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EFAV vs. USMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFAV
USMV

Financial Services

19.4%
11.7%

Industrials

15.9%
6.1%

Healthcare

12.0%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

11.9%
9.4%

Communication Services

9.6%
6.2%

Utilities

8.8%
6.9%

Energy

8.3%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
5.7%

Technology

4.6%
33.9%

Real Estate

3.0%
2.5%

Basic Materials

1.5%
2.4%

Financial Services

EFAV
19.4%
USMV
11.7%

Industrials

EFAV
15.9%
USMV
6.1%

Healthcare

EFAV
12.0%
USMV
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

EFAV
11.9%
USMV
9.4%

Communication Services

EFAV
9.6%
USMV
6.2%

Utilities

EFAV
8.8%
USMV
6.9%

Energy

EFAV
8.3%
USMV
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EFAV
5.0%
USMV
5.7%

Technology

EFAV
4.6%
USMV
33.9%

Real Estate

EFAV
3.0%
USMV
2.5%

Basic Materials

EFAV
1.5%
USMV
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAV vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAV vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFAVUSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.11

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

0.84

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

2.75

+1.93

EFAV vs. USMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAV Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the USMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAV and USMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFAV vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum USMV drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and USMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAVUSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.56%

-33.10%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-6.46%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

-9.36%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.46%

-17.93%

-9.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

-33.10%

+5.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-1.78%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-2.86%

-1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

1.98%

+0.88%

Volatility

EFAV vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) have volatilities of 2.90% and 3.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAVUSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

3.01%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

6.43%

+2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

8.53%

+2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.84%

12.38%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.02%

14.50%

-1.48%

EFAV vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than USMV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EFAV vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison

EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than USMV's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
3.14%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.49%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAV and USMV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USMV has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to EFAV (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAV dropped -27.56% vs USMV's -33.10%.

On 10-year performance, USMV leads with 9.44% vs 6.33% for EFAV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USMV has performed better with a 9.44% return vs 6.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAV.

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 1.49% for USMV.

EFAV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while USMV is Large Cap Blend Equities. EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index, while USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAV and 0.15% for USMV.

EFAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAV and USMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer