EFAV vs. EFA
EFAV (iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF) and EFA (iShares MSCI EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from iShares - EFAV tracks the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index while EFA tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFAV returned 5.76%/yr vs 8.78%/yr for EFA. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EFAV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for EFA.
Performance
EFAV vs. EFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly lower than EFA's 6.49% return. Over the past 10 years, EFAV has underperformed EFA with an annualized return of 5.76%, while EFA has yielded a comparatively higher 8.78% annualized return.
EFAV
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 4.99%
- 1Y
- 8.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- 5.76%
EFA
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- 1Y
- 18.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
EFAV vs. EFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.14% | 26.00% | 5.30% | 12.52% | -15.11% | 7.20% | -0.06% | 16.67% | -5.74% | 22.24% |
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 6.49% | 31.55% | 3.49% | 18.36% | -14.39% | 11.45% | 7.60% | 22.04% | -13.82% | 25.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAV and EFA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.89 |
The correlation between EFAV and EFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFAV vs. EFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFAV
EFA
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
EFAV
EFA
Industrials
EFAV
EFA
Healthcare
EFAV
EFA
Consumer Defensive
EFAV
EFA
Communication Services
EFAV
EFA
Utilities
EFAV
EFA
Energy
EFAV
EFA
Consumer Cyclical
EFAV
EFA
Technology
EFAV
EFA
Real Estate
EFAV
EFA
Basic Materials
EFAV
EFA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAV vs. EFA — Risk / Return Rank
EFAV
EFA
EFAV vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFAV | EFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.22 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 1.62 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.58 | 6.06 | -2.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFAV | EFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 1.21 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.48 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.51 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.31 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
EFAV vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and EFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAV | EFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.56% | -61.04% | +33.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -11.42% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.75% | -14.05% | +5.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.46% | -29.53% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.56% | -34.19% | +6.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.23% | -3.22% | -3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -11.93% | +7.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 3.05% | -0.70% |
Volatility
EFAV vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) is 3.09%, while iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that EFAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAV | EFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 4.85% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | 12.81% | -4.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 15.27% | -4.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.80% | 16.51% | -4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 17.28% | -4.07% |
EFAV vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFAV vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison
EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than EFA's 3.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.18% | 3.38% | 3.24% | 2.98% | 2.69% | 3.33% | 2.13% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 2.57% | 3.07% | 2.76% |
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.10% | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.08% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFAV and EFA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFA has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to EFAV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAV dropped -27.56% vs EFA's -61.04%.
On 10-year performance, EFA leads with 8.78% vs 5.76% for EFAV. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EFA has performed better with a 8.78% return vs 5.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for EFA.
EFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 3.10% for EFAV.
EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index, while EFA tracks MSCI EAFE Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAV and 0.32% for EFA.
EFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFAV and EFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer