PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAV vs. TPDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAV vs. TPDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than TPDAX's 10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, EFAV has underperformed TPDAX with an annualized return of 5.92%, while TPDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.13% annualized return.


EFAV

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
4.42%
6M
5.83%
1Y
9.78%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
5.92%

TPDAX

1D
-0.48%
1M
-1.21%
YTD
10.43%
6M
11.52%
1Y
24.53%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
7.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAV vs. TPDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
4.42%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-5.74%22.24%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
10.43%23.97%5.29%7.71%-5.63%12.15%8.83%13.77%-7.24%4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAV and TPDAX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.61

The correlation between EFAV and TPDAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAV vs. TPDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

TPDAX
TPDAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TPDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TPDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAV vs. TPDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFAVTPDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.42

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

3.28

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.22

11.23

-7.01

EFAV vs. TPDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAV Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the TPDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAV and TPDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFAVTPDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

2.23

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.83

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.72

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.59

-0.06

Drawdowns

EFAV vs. TPDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, which is greater than TPDAX's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and TPDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAVTPDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.56%

-22.29%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.46%

-7.58%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

-7.58%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.46%

-17.58%

-9.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

-22.29%

-5.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

-4.00%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-4.92%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.21%

+0.11%

Volatility

EFAV vs. TPDAX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) at 2.84%. This indicates that EFAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAVTPDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.84%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

9.48%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

11.14%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.79%

10.17%

+1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

9.89%

+3.32%

EFAV vs. TPDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TPDAX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFAV vs. TPDAX - Dividend Comparison

EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than TPDAX's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.06%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
0.73%0.80%2.76%2.35%4.48%0.50%0.00%2.89%2.69%0.13%0.33%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAV and TPDAX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFAV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to TPDAX (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAV dropped -27.56% vs TPDAX's -22.29%.

TPDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAV and TPDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer