PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPDAX vs. PFTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPDAX vs. PFTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) and PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund (PFTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPDAX achieves a 8.31% return, which is significantly higher than PFTSX's 3.91% return.


TPDAX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.27%
6M
0.82%
YTD
8.31%
1Y
21.66%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
6.51%
ALL TIME*
5.50%

PFTSX

1D
1.09%
1M
-0.71%
6M
2.48%
YTD
3.91%
1Y
8.87%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TPDAX vs. PFTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
8.31%23.97%5.29%7.71%-5.63%12.15%15.56%
PFTSX
PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund
3.91%12.31%6.02%10.07%-12.97%6.29%11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TPDAX and PFTSX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020

0.60

The correlation between TPDAX and PFTSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPDAX vs. PFTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPDAX
TPDAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TPDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TPDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

PFTSX
PFTSX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PFTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PFTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPDAX vs. PFTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) and PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund (PFTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPDAXPFTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

1.51

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.54

6.37

+0.17

TPDAX vs. PFTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPDAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the PFTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPDAX and PFTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPDAX vs. PFTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPDAX drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum PFTSX drawdown of -26.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPDAX and PFTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPDAXPFTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.29%

-26.39%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.09%

-5.72%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.09%

-8.04%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.58%

-26.39%

+8.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.84%

-1.41%

-4.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-9.56%

+4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

1.35%

+1.99%

Volatility

TPDAX vs. PFTSX - Volatility Comparison

Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) and PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund (PFTSX) have volatilities of 2.27% and 2.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPDAXPFTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

2.22%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

6.10%

+3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.64%

7.12%

+4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.25%

11.15%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.95%

10.45%

-0.50%

TPDAX vs. PFTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPDAX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is lower than PFTSX's 2.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPDAX vs. PFTSX - Dividend Comparison

TPDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than PFTSX's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PFTSX
PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund
1.68%1.75%2.43%2.22%0.89%13.53%2.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
0.74%0.80%2.76%2.35%4.48%0.50%0.00%2.89%2.69%0.13%0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPDAX and PFTSX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPDAX has higher volatility (2.27%) compared to PFTSX (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPDAX dropped -22.29% vs PFTSX's -26.39%.

TPDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPDAX and PFTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer