PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPDAX vs. FHLKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPDAX vs. FHLKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) and Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TPDAX having a 7.48% return and FHLKX slightly lower at 7.13%.


TPDAX

1D
-0.60%
1M
-3.70%
YTD
7.48%
6M
6.67%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
13.67%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
6.71%

FHLKX

1D
0.68%
1M
1.17%
YTD
7.13%
6M
7.30%
1Y
14.90%
3Y*
10.22%
5Y*
4.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPDAX vs. FHLKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
7.48%23.97%5.29%7.71%-5.63%12.15%10.72%
FHLKX
Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K
7.13%12.17%7.06%9.82%-14.79%5.50%10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between TPDAX and FHLKX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2020

0.66

The correlation between TPDAX and FHLKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPDAX vs. FHLKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPDAX
TPDAX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
TPDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
TPDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLKX
FHLKX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FHLKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPDAX vs. FHLKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) and Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPDAXFHLKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.48

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

3.36

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.11

14.39

-6.28

TPDAX vs. FHLKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPDAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the FHLKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPDAX and FHLKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPDAX vs. FHLKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPDAX drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, which is greater than FHLKX's maximum drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPDAX and FHLKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPDAXFHLKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.29%

-19.09%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-4.42%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.58%

-6.64%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.58%

-19.09%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.56%

-0.12%

-6.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-4.79%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

1.03%

+1.44%

Volatility

TPDAX vs. FHLKX - Volatility Comparison

Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX) at 2.65%. This indicates that TPDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPDAXFHLKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

2.65%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

5.36%

+4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.53%

6.25%

+5.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.22%

6.82%

+3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.93%

7.31%

+2.62%

TPDAX vs. FHLKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPDAX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLKX's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPDAX vs. FHLKX - Dividend Comparison

TPDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than FHLKX's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FHLKX
Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K
2.88%3.05%3.01%2.88%3.85%2.84%1.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
0.75%0.80%2.76%2.35%4.48%0.50%0.00%2.89%2.69%0.13%0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPDAX and FHLKX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPDAX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to FHLKX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPDAX dropped -22.29% vs FHLKX's -19.09%.

FHLKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPDAX and FHLKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer