EFAV vs. THLV
EFAV (iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF) and THLV (THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFAV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index, while THLV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EFAV returned 13.24%/yr vs 12.88%/yr for THLV. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFAV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for THLV.
Performance
EFAV vs. THLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAV achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than THLV's 10.12% return.
EFAV
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 9.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.92%
THLV
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 19.42%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFAV vs. THLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 4.42% | 26.00% | 5.30% | 12.52% | 4.90% |
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 10.12% | 10.50% | 9.52% | 5.88% | 2.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAV and THLV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2022 | 0.57 |
The correlation between EFAV and THLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFAV vs. THLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFAV
THLV
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
EFAV
THLV
Industrials
EFAV
THLV
Healthcare
EFAV
THLV
Consumer Defensive
EFAV
THLV
Communication Services
EFAV
THLV
Utilities
EFAV
THLV
Energy
EFAV
THLV
Consumer Cyclical
EFAV
THLV
Technology
EFAV
THLV
Real Estate
EFAV
THLV
Basic Materials
EFAV
THLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAV vs. THLV — Risk / Return Rank
EFAV
THLV
EFAV vs. THLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFAV | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.35 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.93 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.22 | 8.89 | -4.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFAV | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.98 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.89 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
EFAV vs. THLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAV drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, which is greater than THLV's maximum drawdown of -13.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAV and THLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAV | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.56% | -13.15% | -14.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -6.66% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.75% | -13.15% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.07% | -1.42% | -3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -3.74% | -1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.19% | +0.13% |
Volatility
EFAV vs. THLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) is 3.14%, while THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that EFAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAV | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 3.42% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.19% | 7.49% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.32% | 9.84% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.79% | 11.73% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 11.73% | +1.48% |
EFAV vs. THLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than THLV's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFAV vs. THLV - Dividend Comparison
EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than THLV's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.06% | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.08% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% |
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 1.61% | 1.77% | 1.25% | 2.72% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFAV and THLV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
THLV has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to EFAV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAV dropped -27.56% vs THLV's -13.15%.
On 3-year performance, EFAV leads with 13.24% vs 12.88% for THLV. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EFAV has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 12.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for THLV.
EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 1.61% for THLV.
EFAV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while THLV is Large Cap Blend Equities. EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index, while THLV tracks THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and THOR. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAV and 0.64% for THLV.
THLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFAV and THLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer