PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THLV vs. LOWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THLV vs. LOWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THLV achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly higher than LOWV's 5.85% return.


THLV

1D
-0.45%
1M
-2.87%
6M
2.97%
YTD
8.51%
1Y
14.95%
3Y*
9.68%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.21%

LOWV

1D
0.93%
1M
2.67%
6M
5.32%
YTD
5.85%
1Y
11.55%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$248.27K$453.80K$603.81K
$336.07K$335.31K$358.63K

THLV vs. LOWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
8.51%10.50%9.52%8.83%
LOWV
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
5.85%12.26%20.43%18.90%

Correlation

The correlation between THLV and LOWV is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023

0.70

The correlation between THLV and LOWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

THLV vs. LOWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
THLV
LOWV

Energy

17.5%
2.3%

Technology

17.5%
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

15.5%
8.2%

Real Estate

14.0%
1.6%

Utilities

14.0%
4.6%

Financial Services

13.8%
14.3%

Industrials

13.8%
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

13.7%
6.2%

Healthcare

12.5%
11.6%

Basic Materials

11.3%

-

Communication Services

0.1%
8.7%

Energy

THLV
17.5%
LOWV
2.3%

Technology

THLV
17.5%
LOWV
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

THLV
15.5%
LOWV
8.2%

Real Estate

THLV
14.0%
LOWV
1.6%

Utilities

THLV
14.0%
LOWV
4.6%

Financial Services

THLV
13.8%
LOWV
14.3%

Industrials

THLV
13.8%
LOWV
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

THLV
13.7%
LOWV
6.2%

Healthcare

THLV
12.5%
LOWV
11.6%

Basic Materials

THLV
11.3%
LOWV

-

Communication Services

THLV
0.1%
LOWV
8.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THLV vs. LOWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

THLV
THLV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

LOWV
LOWV Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LOWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOWV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LOWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOWV Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

THLV vs. LOWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THLVLOWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.17

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.07

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

4.25

+1.97

THLV vs. LOWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the LOWV Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THLV and LOWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THLV vs. LOWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THLV drawdown since its inception was -13.15%, smaller than the maximum LOWV drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THLV and LOWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THLVLOWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.15%

-13.87%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-9.59%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-13.87%

+0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

0.00%

-3.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-1.49%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.41%

-0.17%

Volatility

THLV vs. LOWV - Volatility Comparison

THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) at 2.56%. This indicates that THLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THLVLOWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.56%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

7.89%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

10.58%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.74%

11.87%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.74%

11.87%

-0.13%

THLV vs. LOWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

THLV has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than LOWV's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

THLV vs. LOWV - Dividend Comparison

THLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than LOWV's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
LOWV
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
0.86%0.85%0.92%0.77%0.00%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
1.63%1.77%1.25%2.72%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


THLV and LOWV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THLV has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to LOWV (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THLV dropped -13.15% vs LOWV's -13.87%.

On 3-year performance, LOWV leads with 14.74% vs 9.68% for THLV. On fees, LOWV is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, LOWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, LOWV has performed better with a 14.74% return vs 9.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LOWV is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for THLV.

THLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.86% for LOWV.

THLV is categorized as Equal Weight, while LOWV is Low Volatility. They also come from different issuers: THOR and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for THLV and 0.48% for LOWV.

THLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THLV and LOWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer