THLV vs. LOWV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

THLV (THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF) and LOWV (AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. THLV is passively managed, while LOWV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, THLV returned 12.73%/yr vs 15.81%/yr for LOWV. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. THLV charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for LOWV.

Performance

THLV vs. LOWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THLV achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than LOWV's 3.60% return.

THLV

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 1.84%
• YTD: 9.91%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 19.47%
• 3Y*: 12.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LOWV

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 3.60%
• 6M: 3.58%
• 1Y: 12.24%
• 3Y*: 15.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THLV vs. LOWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF	9.91%	10.50%	9.52%	9.44%
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF	3.60%	12.26%	20.43%	20.41%

Correlation

The correlation between THLV and LOWV is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023	0.71

The correlation between THLV and LOWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

THLV vs. LOWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	THLV	LOWV
Energy	17.5%	2.4%
Consumer Cyclical	15.7%	9.4%
Technology	15.7%	32.6%
Utilities	14.7%	4.8%
Real Estate	14.3%	1.8%
Financial Services	13.8%	14.9%
Consumer Defensive	13.7%	5.5%
Industrials	13.5%	7.4%
Healthcare	12.5%	11.4%
Basic Materials	12.2%	-
Communication Services	0.1%	9.7%

Return for Risk

THLV vs. LOWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THLV

THLV Risk / Return Rank: 57
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 57
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 52

LOWV

LOWV Risk / Return Rank: 31
LOWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
LOWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
LOWV Omega Ratio Rank: 31
LOWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
LOWV Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THLV vs. LOWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	THLV	LOWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	1.18	+0.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	1.68	+1.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.21	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	1.30	+1.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.02	5.34	+3.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

THLV vs. LOWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the LOWV Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THLV and LOWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	THLV	LOWV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	1.18	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	1.50	-0.61

Drawdowns

THLV vs. LOWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THLV drawdown since its inception was -13.15%, smaller than the maximum LOWV drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THLV and LOWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	THLV	LOWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.15%	-13.87%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.66%	-9.59%	+2.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.15%	-13.87%	+0.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.61%	-0.12%	-1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.74%	-1.50%	-2.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	2.34%	-0.16%

Volatility

THLV vs. LOWV - Volatility Comparison

THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) at 2.04%. This indicates that THLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	THLV	LOWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	2.04%	+1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.50%	7.85%	-0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.83%	10.44%	-0.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.74%	11.95%	-0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.74%	11.95%	-0.21%

THLV vs. LOWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

THLV has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than LOWV's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

THLV vs. LOWV - Dividend Comparison

THLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than LOWV's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF	0.90%	0.85%	0.92%	0.77%	0.00%
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF	1.61%	1.77%	1.25%	2.72%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THLV and LOWV in my portfolio?

THLV and LOWV have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, THLV or LOWV?

THLV has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to LOWV (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THLV dropped -13.15% vs LOWV's -13.87%.

Which ETF is better, THLV or LOWV?

On 3-year performance, LOWV leads with 15.81% vs 12.73% for THLV. On fees, LOWV is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, LOWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, THLV or LOWV?

Over the 3-year period, LOWV has performed better with a 15.81% return vs 12.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, THLV or LOWV?

LOWV is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for THLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THLV or LOWV?

THLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.90% for LOWV.

What is the main difference between THLV and LOWV?

They also come from different issuers: THOR and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for THLV and 0.48% for LOWV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.