PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THLV vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

THLV vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THLV achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 11.03% return.


THLV

1D
-0.45%
1M
-2.87%
6M
2.97%
YTD
8.51%
1Y
14.95%
3Y*
9.68%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.21%

^GSPC

1D
1.48%
1M
1.57%
6M
8.95%
YTD
11.03%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.29%
ALL TIME*
8.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$38.00T$37.50T$41.55T
$336.07K$335.31K$358.63K

THLV vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
8.51%10.50%9.52%5.88%1.22%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
11.03%16.39%23.31%24.23%-6.59%

Correlation

The correlation between THLV and ^GSPC is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2022

0.77

The correlation between THLV and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THLV vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

THLV
THLV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

THLV vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THLV^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.41

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

10.22

-3.99

THLV vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THLV and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THLV vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THLV drawdown since its inception was -13.15%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THLV and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THLV^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.15%

-56.78%

+43.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-9.10%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-18.90%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-0.12%

-3.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-10.70%

+7.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.14%

+0.10%

Volatility

THLV vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) is 2.84%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that THLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THLV^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

3.80%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

10.20%

-2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

12.86%

-2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.74%

17.02%

-5.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.74%

18.08%

-6.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


THLV and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^GSPC has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to THLV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THLV dropped -13.15% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THLV and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer