PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THLV vs. BDGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

THLV vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

THLV vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
6.82%10.50%9.52%8.65%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
-1.41%10.61%19.07%8.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THLV achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's -1.41% return.


THLV

1D
1.01%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
6.82%
6M
8.18%
1Y
20.10%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
10Y*

BDGS

1D
1.96%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
-1.41%
6M
0.11%
1Y
10.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


THLV vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

THLV has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

THLV vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THLV
THLV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THLV vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THLVBDGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

0.99

+0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

1.67

+0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

1.80

+1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.39

9.34

+2.05

THLV vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THLV and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THLVBDGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

0.99

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

1.51

-0.66

Correlation

The correlation between THLV and BDGS is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

THLV vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

THLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than BDGS's 0.56% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
1.66%1.77%1.25%2.72%0.62%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.56%0.55%1.81%0.84%0.00%

Drawdowns

THLV vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THLV drawdown since its inception was -13.15%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THLV and BDGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


THLVBDGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.15%

-9.12%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-5.85%

-0.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.37%

-2.15%

-2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-0.67%

-3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

1.13%

+0.71%

Volatility

THLV vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) have volatilities of 3.55% and 3.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


THLVBDGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

3.39%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.61%

5.09%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

10.70%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.80%

8.35%

+3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.80%

8.35%

+3.45%