EETH vs. NOBL
EETH (ProShares Ether Strategy ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EETH is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. EETH is actively managed, while NOBL is passively managed. Over the past year, EETH returned -49.03% vs 15.41% for NOBL. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
EETH vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EETH achieves a -38.56% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 10.84% return.
EETH
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- 9.70%
- 6M
- -31.24%
- YTD
- -38.56%
- 1Y
- -49.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.00%
NOBL
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 15.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $666.61K | $697.40K | $772.42K | |
| $66.40M | $66.46M | $60.79M |
EETH vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF | -38.56% | -17.19% | 33.29% | 31.40% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 10.84% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between EETH and NOBL is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EETH vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
EETH
NOBL
EETH vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EETH | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.21 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 1.62 | -2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | 4.10 | -5.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EETH vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EETH drawdown since its inception was -69.22%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EETH and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EETH | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.22% | -35.43% | -33.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.22% | -9.11% | -60.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.12% | -2.31% | -60.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.48% | -3.46% | -28.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.54% | 3.59% | +42.95% |
Volatility
EETH vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) has a higher volatility of 13.16% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 5.07%. This indicates that EETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EETH | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.16% | 5.07% | +8.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.92% | 9.11% | +36.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.62% | 11.92% | +55.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.36% | 14.48% | +53.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.36% | 16.63% | +51.73% |
EETH vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EETH vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
EETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 86.45%, more than NOBL's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF | 73.66% | 56.98% | 10.82% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.04% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EETH and NOBL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EETH has higher volatility (13.16%) compared to NOBL (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EETH dropped -69.22% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 1-year performance, NOBL leads with 15.41% vs -49.03% for EETH. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 15.41% return vs -49.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EETH.
EETH has the higher dividend yield at 73.66%, compared with 2.04% for NOBL.
EETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while NOBL is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EETH and 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EETH and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer