PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EETH vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EETH vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EETH achieves a -45.17% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.73% return.


EETH

1D
-4.16%
1M
-19.80%
YTD
-45.17%
6M
-45.15%
1Y
-31.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMH

1D
-7.01%
1M
7.93%
YTD
72.73%
6M
71.29%
1Y
138.23%
3Y*
62.28%
5Y*
38.18%
10Y*
37.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EETH vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EETH
ProShares Ether Strategy ETF
-45.17%-17.19%33.29%31.40%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
72.73%49.17%39.10%21.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EETH and SMH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EETH vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EETH
EETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EETH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EETH vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EETHSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.58

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

9.31

-9.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.77

33.88

-34.64

EETH vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EETH and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EETH vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EETH drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EETH and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EETHSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.70%

-84.96%

+16.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.70%

-14.93%

-53.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.08%

-7.01%

-60.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.17%

-41.01%

+10.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.47%

4.10%

+37.37%

Volatility

EETH vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) have volatilities of 19.49% and 19.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EETHSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.49%

19.08%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.97%

29.18%

+17.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.41%

34.87%

+34.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.09%

35.83%

+33.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.09%

32.97%

+36.12%

EETH vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EETH vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

EETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 96.89%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EETH
ProShares Ether Strategy ETF
96.89%56.98%10.82%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


EETH and SMH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EETH has higher volatility (19.49%) compared to SMH (19.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EETH dropped -68.70% vs SMH's -84.96%.

On 1-year performance, SMH leads with 138.23% vs -31.81% for EETH. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMH has been the lower-risk option at 19.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMH has performed better with a 138.23% return vs -31.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EETH.

EETH has the higher dividend yield at 96.89%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.

EETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EETH and 0.35% for SMH.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EETH and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer