EET vs. UPV
EET (ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets) and UPV (ProShares Ultra Europe) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EET tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%) while UPV tracks the MSCI Europe Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EET returned 11.03%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for UPV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EET vs. UPV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 54.14% return, which is significantly higher than UPV's 7.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EET having a 11.03% annualized return and UPV not far behind at 10.63%.
EET
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 17.51%
- YTD
- 54.14%
- 6M
- 60.18%
- 1Y
- 118.88%
- 3Y*
- 38.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
UPV
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- 28.43%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
EET vs. UPV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 54.14% | 63.14% | 2.88% | 7.06% | -43.07% | -10.93% | 18.92% | 31.87% | -33.84% | 82.41% |
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe | 7.15% | 68.63% | -4.51% | 32.16% | -36.58% | 32.38% | -3.15% | 47.04% | -32.64% | 57.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between EET and UPV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2010 | 0.69 |
The correlation between EET and UPV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
EET vs. UPV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EET
UPV
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
EET
UPV
Basic Materials
EET
-
UPV
-
Communication Services
EET
-
UPV
-
Consumer Cyclical
EET
-
UPV
-
Consumer Defensive
EET
-
UPV
-
Energy
EET
-
UPV
-
Healthcare
EET
-
UPV
-
Industrials
EET
-
UPV
-
Real Estate
EET
-
UPV
-
Technology
EET
-
UPV
-
Utilities
EET
-
UPV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EET vs. UPV — Risk / Return Rank
EET
UPV
EET vs. UPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EET | UPV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.17 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 1.22 | +3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.64 | 4.16 | +12.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EET | UPV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02 | 0.93 | +2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.22 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.29 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.25 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
EET vs. UPV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than UPV's maximum drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and UPV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EET | UPV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.66% | -67.25% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.38% | -23.41% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.89% | -27.54% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.88% | -58.33% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.07% | -67.25% | -1.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -7.58% | +5.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.27% | -20.83% | -16.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.17% | 6.85% | +0.32% |
Volatility
EET vs. UPV - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 17.46% compared to ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) at 11.54%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EET | UPV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.46% | 11.54% | +5.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.52% | 25.61% | +8.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.66% | 30.74% | +8.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.78% | 35.38% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.60% | 37.14% | +3.46% |
EET vs. UPV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EET and UPV have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EET vs. UPV - Dividend Comparison
EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than UPV's 2.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 1.23% | 1.82% | 3.85% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 0.16% |
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe | 2.14% | 2.11% | 2.70% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 3.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EET and UPV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EET has higher volatility (17.46%) compared to UPV (11.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs UPV's -67.25%.
On 10-year performance, EET leads with 11.03% vs 10.63% for UPV. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UPV has been the lower-risk option at 11.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EET has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 10.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EET and UPV have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UPV has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.23% for EET.
EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while UPV tracks MSCI Europe Index (200%).
EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EET and UPV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer