UPV vs. FEZ
UPV (ProShares Ultra Europe) and FEZ (State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UPV is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Index (200%), while FEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UPV returned 12.49%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for FEZ. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UPV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FEZ.
Performance
UPV vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPV achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly higher than FEZ's 6.43% return. Over the past 10 years, UPV has outperformed FEZ with an annualized return of 12.49%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively lower 11.53% annualized return.
UPV
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 7.70%
- 1Y
- 30.83%
- 3Y*
- 24.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
FEZ
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 6.43%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- 1Y
- 19.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
UPV vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe | 7.71% | 68.63% | -4.51% | 32.16% | -36.58% | 32.38% | -3.15% | 47.04% | -32.64% | 57.44% |
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 6.43% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | 24.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPV and FEZ is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2010 | 0.90 |
The correlation between UPV and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
UPV vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UPV
FEZ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
UPV
FEZ
Basic Materials
UPV
-
FEZ
Communication Services
UPV
-
FEZ
Consumer Cyclical
UPV
-
FEZ
Consumer Defensive
UPV
-
FEZ
Energy
UPV
-
FEZ
Healthcare
UPV
-
FEZ
Industrials
UPV
-
FEZ
Real Estate
UPV
-
FEZ
-
Technology
UPV
-
FEZ
Utilities
UPV
-
FEZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPV vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank
UPV
FEZ
UPV vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) and State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPV | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.19 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 1.42 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 4.82 | -0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPV vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPV drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, roughly equal to the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPV and FEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPV | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.25% | -64.21% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.41% | -13.63% | -9.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.54% | -15.85% | -11.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.33% | -35.05% | -23.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.25% | -39.69% | -27.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.10% | -2.33% | -4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.78% | -17.04% | -3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.96% | 3.99% | +2.97% |
Volatility
UPV vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) has a higher volatility of 9.89% compared to State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) at 5.85%. This indicates that UPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPV | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.89% | 5.85% | +4.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.79% | 15.57% | +11.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.55% | 18.40% | +13.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 20.70% | +14.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.43% | 20.75% | +15.68% |
UPV vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPV vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison
UPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than FEZ's 2.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.64% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe | 2.13% | 2.11% | 2.70% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 3.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, UPV and FEZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
UPV has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to FEZ (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPV dropped -67.25% vs FEZ's -64.21%.
On 10-year performance, UPV leads with 12.49% vs 11.53% for FEZ. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FEZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UPV has performed better with a 12.49% return vs 11.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UPV.
FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 2.13% for UPV.
UPV is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FEZ is Europe Equities. UPV tracks MSCI Europe Index (200%), while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UPV and 0.29% for FEZ.
FEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPV and FEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer