PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPV vs. FEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPV vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPV achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly higher than FEZ's 6.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UPV having a 10.88% annualized return and FEZ not far behind at 10.42%.


UPV

1D
0.93%
1M
3.27%
YTD
9.64%
6M
17.09%
1Y
29.31%
3Y*
24.77%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
10.88%

FEZ

1D
0.81%
1M
3.77%
YTD
6.51%
6M
8.91%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
18.22%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPV vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UPV
ProShares Ultra Europe
9.64%68.63%-4.51%32.16%-36.58%32.38%-3.15%47.04%-32.64%57.44%
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
6.51%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%

Correlation

The correlation between UPV and FEZ is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2010

0.90

The correlation between UPV and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

UPV vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UPV
FEZ

Financial Services

35.5%
23.4%

Basic Materials

-

3.5%

Communication Services

-

3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.4%

Energy

-

5.0%

Healthcare

-

5.2%

Industrials

-

20.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

17.9%

Utilities

-

4.6%

Financial Services

UPV
35.5%
FEZ
23.4%

Basic Materials

UPV

-

FEZ
3.5%

Communication Services

UPV

-

FEZ
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

UPV

-

FEZ
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

UPV

-

FEZ
5.4%

Energy

UPV

-

FEZ
5.0%

Healthcare

UPV

-

FEZ
5.2%

Industrials

UPV

-

FEZ
20.1%

Real Estate

UPV

-

FEZ

-

Technology

UPV

-

FEZ
17.9%

Utilities

UPV

-

FEZ
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPV vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPV
UPV Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
UPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPV Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
UPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPV vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UPVFEZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

0.99

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

1.49

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

1.40

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.62

4.79

-0.17

UPV vs. FEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPV Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the FEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPV and FEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UPVFEZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

0.99

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.50

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.50

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.30

-0.05

Drawdowns

UPV vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPV drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, roughly equal to the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPV and FEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPVFEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.25%

-64.21%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.41%

-13.63%

-9.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.54%

-15.85%

-11.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.33%

-35.05%

-23.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.25%

-39.69%

-27.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.43%

-1.09%

-4.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.83%

-17.08%

-3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.83%

3.99%

+2.84%

Volatility

UPV vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) has a higher volatility of 12.04% compared to SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) at 7.17%. This indicates that UPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPVFEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.04%

7.17%

+4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.52%

14.80%

+10.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.69%

17.90%

+12.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.37%

20.60%

+14.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.14%

21.11%

+16.03%

UPV vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

UPV vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison

UPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than FEZ's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.54%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
UPV
ProShares Ultra Europe
2.09%2.11%2.70%1.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.65%3.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, UPV and FEZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UPV has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to FEZ (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPV dropped -67.25% vs FEZ's -64.21%.

On 10-year performance, UPV leads with 10.88% vs 10.42% for FEZ. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FEZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UPV has performed better with a 10.88% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UPV.

FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 2.09% for UPV.

UPV is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FEZ is Europe Equities. UPV tracks MSCI Europe Index (200%), while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UPV and 0.29% for FEZ.

FEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPV and FEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer