UPV vs. SCHF
UPV (ProShares Ultra Europe) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UPV is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Index (200%), while SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UPV returned 12.77%/yr vs 11.18%/yr for SCHF. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UPV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
UPV vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPV achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 17.68% return. Over the past 10 years, UPV has outperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 12.77%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively lower 11.18% annualized return.
UPV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 11.40%
- 1Y
- 36.17%
- 3Y*
- 25.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 18.27%
- 1Y
- 36.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.18%
UPV vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe | 10.42% | 68.63% | -4.51% | 32.16% | -36.58% | 32.38% | -3.15% | 47.04% | -32.64% | 57.44% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 17.68% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPV and SCHF is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2010 | 0.89 |
The correlation between UPV and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
UPV vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UPV
SCHF
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
UPV
SCHF
Basic Materials
UPV
-
SCHF
Communication Services
UPV
-
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
UPV
-
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
UPV
-
SCHF
Energy
UPV
-
SCHF
Healthcare
UPV
-
SCHF
Industrials
UPV
-
SCHF
Real Estate
UPV
-
SCHF
Technology
UPV
-
SCHF
Utilities
UPV
-
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPV vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
UPV
SCHF
UPV vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPV | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.40 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 3.18 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.22 | 12.22 | -7.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPV vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPV drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPV and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPV | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.25% | -34.87% | -32.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.41% | -11.48% | -11.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.54% | -13.41% | -14.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.33% | -29.14% | -29.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.25% | -34.87% | -32.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.76% | 0.00% | -4.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.78% | -7.36% | -13.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.95% | 2.98% | +3.97% |
Volatility
UPV vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) has a higher volatility of 9.63% compared to Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) at 6.42%. This indicates that UPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPV | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.63% | 6.42% | +3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.70% | 14.43% | +12.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.51% | 16.63% | +14.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.51% | 16.55% | +18.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.96% | 17.21% | +19.75% |
UPV vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPV vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
UPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than SCHF's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.90% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe | 2.07% | 2.11% | 2.70% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 3.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, UPV and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
UPV has higher volatility (9.63%) compared to SCHF (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPV dropped -67.25% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 10-year performance, UPV leads with 12.77% vs 11.18% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHF has been the lower-risk option at 6.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UPV has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UPV.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.07% for UPV.
UPV is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. UPV tracks MSCI Europe Index (200%), while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UPV and 0.06% for SCHF.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPV and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer