EET vs. TQQQ
EET (ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EET tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EET returned 10.67%/yr vs 45.25%/yr for TQQQ. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EET vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EET having a 41.10% return and TQQQ slightly lower at 39.27%. Over the past 10 years, EET has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 10.67%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.25% annualized return.
EET
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 41.10%
- 6M
- 42.83%
- 1Y
- 81.79%
- 3Y*
- 34.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
TQQQ
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -5.83%
- YTD
- 39.27%
- 6M
- 32.62%
- 1Y
- 89.02%
- 3Y*
- 57.21%
- 5Y*
- 21.17%
- 10Y*
- 45.25%
EET vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 41.10% | 63.14% | 2.88% | 7.06% | -43.07% | -10.93% | 18.92% | 31.87% | -33.84% | 82.41% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 39.27% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between EET and TQQQ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.66 |
The correlation between EET and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (5 years) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EET vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EET
TQQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EET
TQQQ
Basic Materials
EET
-
TQQQ
Communication Services
EET
-
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
EET
-
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
EET
-
TQQQ
Energy
EET
-
TQQQ
Healthcare
EET
-
TQQQ
Industrials
EET
-
TQQQ
Real Estate
EET
-
TQQQ
Technology
EET
-
TQQQ
Utilities
EET
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EET vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
EET
TQQQ
EET vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EET | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.28 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 2.42 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | 7.68 | +3.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EET vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EET | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.66% | -81.66% | +10.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.38% | -36.97% | +10.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.89% | -58.04% | +23.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.51% | -81.66% | +17.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.07% | -81.66% | +12.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.38% | -15.96% | +4.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.16% | -18.49% | -18.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.57% | 11.64% | -4.07% |
Volatility
EET vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) is 25.42%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 27.27%. This indicates that EET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EET | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.42% | 27.27% | -1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.30% | 43.24% | -1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.20% | 53.35% | -8.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.04% | 67.41% | -28.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.96% | 66.31% | -25.35% |
EET vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EET and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EET vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than TQQQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 1.34% | 1.82% | 3.85% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.43% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EET and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (27.27%) compared to EET (25.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.25% vs 10.67% for EET. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EET has been the lower-risk option at 25.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.25% return vs 10.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EET and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EET has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.43% for TQQQ.
EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).
EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EET and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer