PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EET vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EET vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 54.14% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 11.03%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.33% annualized return.


EET

1D
-2.52%
1M
17.51%
YTD
54.14%
6M
60.18%
1Y
118.88%
3Y*
38.53%
5Y*
4.07%
10Y*
11.03%

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EET vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
54.14%63.14%2.88%7.06%-43.07%-10.93%18.92%31.87%-33.84%82.41%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and TQQQ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.66

The correlation between EET and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (5 years) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EET vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EET
TQQQ

Financial Services

51.5%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

EET
51.5%
TQQQ
0.2%

Basic Materials

EET

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

EET

-

TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EET

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

EET

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

EET

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Healthcare

EET

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

EET

-

TQQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

EET

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Technology

EET

-

TQQQ
53.8%

Utilities

EET

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EET vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EET
EET Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EET vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EETTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.40

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

3.75

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.64

12.27

+4.37

EET vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EETTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02

2.92

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.43

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.69

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.74

-0.62

Drawdowns

EET vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EETTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.66%

-81.66%

+10.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.38%

-36.97%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.89%

-58.04%

+23.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.88%

-81.66%

+16.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

-81.66%

+12.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-0.76%

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.27%

-18.52%

-18.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.17%

11.28%

-4.11%

Volatility

EET vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 17.46% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.29%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EETTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.46%

13.29%

+4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.52%

36.04%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.66%

47.60%

-7.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.78%

66.53%

-28.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.60%

65.96%

-25.36%

EET vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EET and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

EET vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
1.23%1.82%3.85%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.01%1.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


EET and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EET has higher volatility (17.46%) compared to TQQQ (13.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.33% vs 11.03% for EET. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.33% return vs 11.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EET and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

EET has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EET and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer