PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EET vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EET vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EET having a 41.10% return and TQQQ slightly lower at 39.27%. Over the past 10 years, EET has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 10.67%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.25% annualized return.


EET

1D
-0.60%
1M
2.69%
YTD
41.10%
6M
42.83%
1Y
81.79%
3Y*
34.98%
5Y*
2.48%
10Y*
10.67%

TQQQ

1D
-1.53%
1M
-5.83%
YTD
39.27%
6M
32.62%
1Y
89.02%
3Y*
57.21%
5Y*
21.17%
10Y*
45.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EET vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
41.10%63.14%2.88%7.06%-43.07%-10.93%18.92%31.87%-33.84%82.41%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
39.27%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and TQQQ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.66

The correlation between EET and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (5 years) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EET vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EET
TQQQ

Financial Services

41.4%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

EET
41.4%
TQQQ
0.2%

Basic Materials

EET

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

EET

-

TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EET

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

EET

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

EET

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Healthcare

EET

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

EET

-

TQQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

EET

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Technology

EET

-

TQQQ
53.8%

Utilities

EET

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EET vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EET
EET Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EET vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EETTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

2.42

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

7.68

+3.17

EET vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EET vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EETTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.66%

-81.66%

+10.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.38%

-36.97%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.89%

-58.04%

+23.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.51%

-81.66%

+17.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

-81.66%

+12.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.38%

-15.96%

+4.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.16%

-18.49%

-18.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.57%

11.64%

-4.07%

Volatility

EET vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) is 25.42%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 27.27%. This indicates that EET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EETTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.42%

27.27%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.30%

43.24%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.20%

53.35%

-8.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.04%

67.41%

-28.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.96%

66.31%

-25.35%

EET vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EET and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

EET vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than TQQQ's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
1.34%1.82%3.85%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.01%1.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.43%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


EET and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (27.27%) compared to EET (25.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.25% vs 10.67% for EET. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EET has been the lower-risk option at 25.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.25% return vs 10.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EET and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

EET has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.43% for TQQQ.

EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EET and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer