PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQQQ vs. TECL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQQQ vs. TECL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 38.79% return, which is significantly lower than TECL's 72.61% return. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ has underperformed TECL with an annualized return of 42.84%, while TECL has yielded a comparatively higher 50.09% annualized return.


TQQQ

1D
-14.28%
1M
-4.23%
YTD
38.79%
6M
30.51%
1Y
98.25%
3Y*
60.11%
5Y*
24.09%
10Y*
42.84%

TECL

1D
-19.93%
1M
4.92%
YTD
72.61%
6M
62.00%
1Y
174.82%
3Y*
66.22%
5Y*
35.93%
10Y*
50.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ vs. TECL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
38.79%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
72.61%38.60%36.15%203.14%-74.32%112.80%69.46%185.58%-24.03%124.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and TECL is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.96

The correlation between TQQQ and TECL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

TQQQ vs. TECL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TQQQ
TECL

Technology

53.8%
20.6%

Communication Services

15.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Industrials

2.8%
0.0%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.6%
0.0%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

TQQQ
53.8%
TECL
20.6%

Communication Services

TQQQ
15.8%
TECL

-

Consumer Cyclical

TQQQ
12.3%
TECL

-

Consumer Defensive

TQQQ
7.7%
TECL

-

Healthcare

TQQQ
4.2%
TECL

-

Industrials

TQQQ
2.8%
TECL
0.0%

Utilities

TQQQ
1.4%
TECL

-

Basic Materials

TQQQ
1.1%
TECL

-

Energy

TQQQ
0.6%
TECL
0.0%

Financial Services

TQQQ
0.2%
TECL

-

Real Estate

TQQQ
0.1%
TECL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. TECL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

TECL
TECL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECL Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECL Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ vs. TECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQQQTECLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.38

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

3.95

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

11.27

-2.07

TQQQ vs. TECL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the TECL Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQQ and TECL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQQQTECLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.80

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.48

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.69

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.73

-0.01

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. TECL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, roughly equal to the maximum TECL drawdown of -77.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and TECL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQQQTECLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.66%

-77.96%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.97%

-46.58%

+9.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

-66.58%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

-77.96%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

-77.96%

-3.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.25%

-25.87%

+9.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-18.38%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.33%

16.27%

-4.94%

Volatility

TQQQ vs. TECL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) is 20.42%, while Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a volatility of 31.75%. This indicates that TQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TECL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQQQTECLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.42%

31.75%

-11.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.33%

55.01%

-15.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.81%

65.56%

-15.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.79%

74.60%

-7.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.11%

72.63%

-6.52%

TQQQ vs. TECL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TECL's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQQQ vs. TECL - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than TECL's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
4.12%7.19%0.29%0.28%0.22%0.32%0.52%0.25%0.47%0.10%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.43%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, TQQQ and TECL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TECL has higher volatility (31.75%) compared to TQQQ (20.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs TECL's -77.96%.

On 10-year performance, TECL leads with 50.09% vs 42.84% for TQQQ. On fees, TECL is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 20.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TECL has performed better with a 50.09% return vs 42.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TECL is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

TECL has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.43% for TQQQ.

TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while TECL tracks Technology Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 0.91% for TECL.

TECL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQQQ and TECL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer