PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EET vs. FRDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EET vs. FRDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EET vs. FRDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
4.32%63.14%2.88%7.06%-43.07%-10.93%18.92%29.83%
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
7.05%61.27%1.70%22.77%-14.45%6.13%16.90%12.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly lower than FRDM's 7.05% return.


EET

1D
7.49%
1M
-18.78%
YTD
4.32%
6M
10.24%
1Y
59.33%
3Y*
21.28%
5Y*
-2.38%
10Y*
6.49%

FRDM

1D
4.49%
1M
-12.64%
YTD
7.05%
6M
24.68%
1Y
59.74%
3Y*
26.32%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EET vs. FRDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FRDM's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EET vs. FRDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EET
EET Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FRDM
FRDM Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FRDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EET vs. FRDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EETFRDMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

2.55

-1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

3.15

-1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.47

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

3.52

-1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.31

14.69

-6.38

EET vs. FRDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the FRDM Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and FRDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EETFRDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.55

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.65

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.66

-0.60

Correlation

The correlation between EET and FRDM is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EET vs. FRDM - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than FRDM's 2.04% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
1.81%1.82%3.85%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.01%1.40%0.16%
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
2.04%2.26%2.53%2.66%2.72%2.17%1.11%1.07%0.00%

Drawdowns

EET vs. FRDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than FRDM's maximum drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and FRDM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EETFRDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.66%

-40.49%

-31.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.38%

-16.87%

-9.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.98%

-29.25%

-35.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.01%

-13.13%

-10.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.58%

-7.21%

-30.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.08%

4.04%

+3.04%

Volatility

EET vs. FRDM - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 21.60% compared to Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) at 13.19%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EETFRDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.60%

13.19%

+8.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.38%

18.31%

+12.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.28%

23.57%

+16.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.90%

20.00%

+16.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.27%

22.36%

+17.91%