PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EET vs. FRDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EET vs. FRDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 54.14% return, which is significantly higher than FRDM's 44.61% return.


EET

1D
-2.52%
1M
17.51%
YTD
54.14%
6M
60.18%
1Y
118.88%
3Y*
38.53%
5Y*
4.07%
10Y*
11.03%

FRDM

1D
-1.30%
1M
17.06%
YTD
44.61%
6M
53.16%
1Y
97.46%
3Y*
37.08%
5Y*
19.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EET vs. FRDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
54.14%63.14%2.88%7.06%-43.07%-10.93%18.92%29.83%
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
44.61%61.27%1.70%22.77%-14.45%6.13%16.90%12.33%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and FRDM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2019

0.85

The correlation between EET and FRDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

EET vs. FRDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EET
FRDM

Financial Services

51.5%
22.1%

Basic Materials

-

7.4%

Communication Services

-

3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.2%

Energy

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

1.8%

Industrials

-

8.6%

Real Estate

-

2.5%

Technology

-

41.1%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Financial Services

EET
51.5%
FRDM
22.1%

Basic Materials

EET

-

FRDM
7.4%

Communication Services

EET

-

FRDM
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EET

-

FRDM
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

EET

-

FRDM
2.2%

Energy

EET

-

FRDM
0.1%

Healthcare

EET

-

FRDM
1.8%

Industrials

EET

-

FRDM
8.6%

Real Estate

EET

-

FRDM
2.5%

Technology

EET

-

FRDM
41.1%

Utilities

EET

-

FRDM
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EET vs. FRDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EET
EET Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FRDM
FRDM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FRDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EET vs. FRDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EETFRDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.67

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

5.81

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.64

23.37

-6.74

EET vs. FRDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is comparable to the FRDM Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and FRDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EETFRDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02

4.00

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.93

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.85

-0.73

Drawdowns

EET vs. FRDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than FRDM's maximum drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and FRDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EETFRDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.66%

-40.49%

-31.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.38%

-16.87%

-9.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.89%

-16.87%

-18.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.88%

-29.25%

-35.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-1.30%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.27%

-7.09%

-30.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.17%

4.18%

+2.99%

Volatility

EET vs. FRDM - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 17.46% compared to Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) at 11.03%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EETFRDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.46%

11.03%

+6.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.52%

21.65%

+12.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.66%

24.50%

+15.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.78%

20.80%

+16.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.60%

22.77%

+17.83%

EET vs. FRDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FRDM's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EET vs. FRDM - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than FRDM's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
1.23%1.82%3.85%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.01%1.40%0.16%
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
1.51%2.26%2.53%2.66%2.72%2.17%1.11%1.07%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, EET and FRDM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EET has higher volatility (17.46%) compared to FRDM (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs FRDM's -40.49%.

On 5-year performance, FRDM leads with 19.30% vs 4.07% for EET. On fees, FRDM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FRDM has been the lower-risk option at 11.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FRDM has performed better with a 19.30% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FRDM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EET.

FRDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.23% for EET.

EET is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FRDM is Emerging Markets Diversified. EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while FRDM tracks Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Freedom Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EET and 0.49% for FRDM.

FRDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 3.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EET and FRDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer