PortfoliosLab logo
FRDM vs. DFAE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FRDM and DFAE is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

FRDM vs. DFAE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
33.37%
10.71%
FRDM
DFAE

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FRDM:

0.62

DFAE:

0.44

Sortino Ratio

FRDM:

1.01

DFAE:

0.75

Omega Ratio

FRDM:

1.13

DFAE:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

FRDM:

0.88

DFAE:

0.45

Martin Ratio

FRDM:

2.28

DFAE:

1.33

Ulcer Index

FRDM:

5.94%

DFAE:

6.06%

Daily Std Dev

FRDM:

22.03%

DFAE:

18.50%

Max Drawdown

FRDM:

-40.49%

DFAE:

-32.21%

Current Drawdown

FRDM:

-1.79%

DFAE:

-7.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRDM achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly higher than DFAE's 1.95% return.


FRDM

YTD

10.87%

1M

0.90%

6M

1.66%

1Y

14.10%

5Y*

14.59%

10Y*

N/A

DFAE

YTD

1.95%

1M

-2.35%

6M

-2.83%

1Y

6.30%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FRDM vs. DFAE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRDM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FRDM: current value is 0.49%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FRDM: 0.49%
Expense ratio chart for DFAE: current value is 0.35%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
DFAE: 0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FRDM vs. DFAE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRDM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FRDM is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FRDM is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FRDM is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FRDM is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FRDM is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FRDM is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFAE is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFAE is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFAE is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFAE is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFAE is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFAE is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FRDM vs. DFAE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FRDM, currently valued at 0.62, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
FRDM: 0.62
DFAE: 0.44
The chart of Sortino ratio for FRDM, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FRDM: 1.01
DFAE: 0.75
The chart of Omega ratio for FRDM, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
FRDM: 1.13
DFAE: 1.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for FRDM, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
FRDM: 0.88
DFAE: 0.45
The chart of Martin ratio for FRDM, currently valued at 2.28, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
FRDM: 2.28
DFAE: 1.33

The current FRDM Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the DFAE Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRDM and DFAE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.62
0.44
FRDM
DFAE

Dividends

FRDM vs. DFAE - Dividend Comparison

FRDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than DFAE's 2.41% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
2.99%2.54%2.66%2.72%2.17%1.11%1.07%
DFAE
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF
2.41%2.35%2.43%2.85%1.64%0.01%0.00%

Drawdowns

FRDM vs. DFAE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRDM drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than DFAE's maximum drawdown of -32.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDM and DFAE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-1.79%
-7.59%
FRDM
DFAE

Volatility

FRDM vs. DFAE - Volatility Comparison

Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) has a higher volatility of 12.48% compared to Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) at 10.96%. This indicates that FRDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
12.48%
10.96%
FRDM
DFAE