PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRDM vs. DFAE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FRDM vs. DFAE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FRDM vs. DFAE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
7.05%61.27%1.70%22.77%-14.45%6.13%6.11%
DFAE
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF
4.12%31.48%7.68%12.63%-17.52%3.53%4.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRDM achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly higher than DFAE's 4.12% return.


FRDM

1D
4.49%
1M
-12.64%
YTD
7.05%
6M
24.68%
1Y
59.74%
3Y*
26.32%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*

DFAE

1D
3.52%
1M
-8.86%
YTD
4.12%
6M
8.25%
1Y
33.86%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FRDM vs. DFAE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRDM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FRDM vs. DFAE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRDM
FRDM Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FRDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAE
DFAE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DFAE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRDM vs. DFAE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRDMDFAEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.55

1.76

+0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.15

2.35

+0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.35

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

2.61

+0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.69

10.09

+4.60

FRDM vs. DFAE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRDM Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the DFAE Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRDM and DFAE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRDMDFAEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

1.76

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.35

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.44

+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between FRDM and DFAE is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FRDM vs. DFAE - Dividend Comparison

FRDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than DFAE's 2.11% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
2.04%2.26%2.53%2.66%2.72%2.17%1.11%1.07%
DFAE
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF
2.11%2.20%2.35%2.43%2.85%1.63%0.01%0.00%

Drawdowns

FRDM vs. DFAE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRDM drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than DFAE's maximum drawdown of -32.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDM and DFAE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FRDMDFAEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.49%

-32.21%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.87%

-12.80%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.25%

-32.21%

+2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.13%

-9.73%

-3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-10.59%

+3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

3.31%

+0.73%

Volatility

FRDM vs. DFAE - Volatility Comparison

Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) has a higher volatility of 13.19% compared to Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) at 10.23%. This indicates that FRDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FRDMDFAEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.19%

10.23%

+2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.31%

14.31%

+4.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.57%

19.37%

+4.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.00%

17.36%

+2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

17.50%

+4.86%