EET vs. EDZ
EET (ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets) and EDZ (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - EET tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%) while EDZ tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EET returned 8.25%/yr vs -34.74%/yr for EDZ. At a correlation of -0.98, they often move in opposite directions. EET charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for EDZ.
Performance
EET vs. EDZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 34.00% return, which is significantly higher than EDZ's -53.78% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has outperformed EDZ with an annualized return of 8.25%, while EDZ has yielded a comparatively lower -34.74% annualized return.
EET
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- 6M
- 21.73%
- YTD
- 34.00%
- 1Y
- 70.14%
- 3Y*
- 28.92%
- 5Y*
- 2.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.25%
EDZ
- 1D
- -5.75%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- 6M
- -46.16%
- YTD
- -53.78%
- 1Y
- -68.84%
- 3Y*
- -44.75%
- 5Y*
- -25.19%
- 10Y*
- -34.74%
EET vs. EDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 34.00% | 63.14% | 2.88% | 7.06% | -43.07% | -10.93% | 18.92% | 31.87% | -33.84% | 82.41% |
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares | -53.78% | -59.30% | -12.71% | -20.28% | 49.27% | -8.69% | -68.79% | -43.01% | 32.87% | -64.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between EET and EDZ is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2009 | -0.98 |
The correlation between EET and EDZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
EET vs. EDZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EET
EDZ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EET
EDZ
Basic Materials
EET
-
EDZ
Communication Services
EET
-
EDZ
Consumer Cyclical
EET
-
EDZ
Consumer Defensive
EET
-
EDZ
Energy
EET
-
EDZ
Healthcare
EET
-
EDZ
Industrials
EET
-
EDZ
Real Estate
EET
-
EDZ
Technology
EET
-
EDZ
Utilities
EET
-
EDZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EET vs. EDZ — Risk / Return Rank
EET
EDZ
EET vs. EDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EET | EDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.79 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | -0.92 | +3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | -1.53 | +10.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EET vs. EDZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, smaller than the maximum EDZ drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and EDZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EET | EDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.66% | -99.99% | +28.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.38% | -74.94% | +48.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.89% | -90.46% | +55.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.82% | -92.91% | +31.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.07% | -98.90% | +29.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.85% | -99.99% | +84.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.09% | -97.73% | +60.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.13% | 45.12% | -36.99% |
Volatility
EET vs. EDZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) is 21.61%, while Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) has a volatility of 30.55%. This indicates that EET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EET | EDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.61% | 30.55% | -8.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.43% | 63.81% | -20.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.09% | 70.33% | -23.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.46% | 59.43% | -19.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.07% | 61.63% | -20.56% |
EET vs. EDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than EDZ's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
EET vs. EDZ - Dividend Comparison
EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than EDZ's 7.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares | 7.24% | 6.58% | 4.87% | 4.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 1.67% | 0.68% |
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 1.49% | 1.82% | 3.85% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EET and EDZ have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDZ has higher volatility (30.55%) compared to EET (21.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs EDZ's -99.99%.
On 10-year performance, EET leads with 8.25% vs -34.74% for EDZ. On fees, EET is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, EET has been the lower-risk option at 21.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EET has performed better with a 8.25% return vs -34.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EET is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for EDZ.
EDZ has the higher dividend yield at 7.24%, compared with 1.49% for EET.
EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while EDZ tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EET and 1.08% for EDZ.
EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EET and EDZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer