EDZ vs. AMAT
EDZ (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-300%), while AMAT (Applied Materials, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, EDZ returned -35.27%/yr vs 38.75%/yr for AMAT. At a correlation of -0.57, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
EDZ vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDZ achieves a -55.94% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 135.03% return. Over the past 10 years, EDZ has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of -35.27%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 38.75% annualized return.
EDZ
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- 6M
- -49.66%
- YTD
- -55.94%
- 1Y
- -70.46%
- 3Y*
- -47.23%
- 5Y*
- -26.31%
- 10Y*
- -35.27%
AMAT
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- 6.21%
- 6M
- 100.54%
- YTD
- 135.03%
- 1Y
- 206.63%
- 3Y*
- 64.96%
- 5Y*
- 36.03%
- 10Y*
- 38.75%
EDZ vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares | -55.94% | -59.30% | -12.71% | -20.28% | 49.27% | -8.69% | -68.79% | -43.01% | 32.87% | -64.12% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 135.03% | 59.60% | 1.13% | 67.97% | -37.54% | 83.64% | 43.29% | 89.86% | -34.92% | 59.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDZ and AMAT is -0.63, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2008 | -0.57 |
The correlation between EDZ and AMAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.63 to -0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDZ vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank
EDZ
AMAT
EDZ vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDZ | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.50 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 8.92 | -9.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.57 | 25.57 | -27.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDZ vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDZ drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than AMAT's maximum drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDZ and AMAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDZ | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -85.22% | -14.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.94% | -23.31% | -51.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.46% | -49.88% | -40.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.91% | -55.14% | -37.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.90% | -55.14% | -43.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -16.67% | -83.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.73% | -38.73% | -59.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.71% | 8.11% | +36.60% |
Volatility
EDZ vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) has a higher volatility of 31.98% compared to Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) at 29.14%. This indicates that EDZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDZ | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.98% | 29.14% | +2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.58% | 45.82% | +16.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.16% | 55.26% | +13.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.14% | 45.66% | +13.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.50% | 43.68% | +17.82% |
Dividends
EDZ vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
EDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.59%, more than AMAT's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.32% | 0.69% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% |
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares | 7.59% | 6.58% | 4.87% | 4.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 1.67% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDZ and AMAT have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDZ has higher volatility (31.98%) compared to AMAT (29.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDZ dropped -99.99% vs AMAT's -85.22%.
AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDZ and AMAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer