PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMO vs. JMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMO vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMO achieves a 36.85% return, which is significantly higher than JMOM's 22.57% return.


EEMO

1D
-2.42%
1M
10.83%
YTD
36.85%
6M
37.37%
1Y
51.13%
3Y*
24.00%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
8.50%

JMOM

1D
-0.18%
1M
7.73%
YTD
22.57%
6M
21.71%
1Y
36.34%
3Y*
28.46%
5Y*
16.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMO vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
36.85%10.99%9.88%13.90%-18.73%-5.57%9.66%21.17%-17.24%1.13%
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
22.57%18.02%28.47%22.89%-20.83%25.03%29.25%28.24%-5.25%3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMO and JMOM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.58

The correlation between EEMO and JMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEMO vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMO
JMOM

Technology

43.8%
38.1%

Financial Services

18.0%
9.6%

Basic Materials

12.9%
1.3%

Industrials

11.5%
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.2%
6.9%

Healthcare

3.0%
8.7%

Energy

2.5%
3.8%

Utilities

2.0%
2.3%

Communication Services

1.5%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
5.7%

Real Estate

0.5%
2.5%

Technology

EEMO
43.8%
JMOM
38.1%

Financial Services

EEMO
18.0%
JMOM
9.6%

Basic Materials

EEMO
12.9%
JMOM
1.3%

Industrials

EEMO
11.5%
JMOM
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMO
3.2%
JMOM
6.9%

Healthcare

EEMO
3.0%
JMOM
8.7%

Energy

EEMO
2.5%
JMOM
3.8%

Utilities

EEMO
2.0%
JMOM
2.3%

Communication Services

EEMO
1.5%
JMOM
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

EEMO
1.2%
JMOM
5.7%

Real Estate

EEMO
0.5%
JMOM
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMO vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

JMOM
JMOM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
JMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
JMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMO vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMOJMOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.45

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

4.64

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.93

21.99

-8.06

EEMO vs. JMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the JMOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMO and JMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMOJMOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.55

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.87

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.82

-0.69

Drawdowns

EEMO vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMO drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than JMOM's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMO and JMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMOJMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.47%

-34.31%

-14.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-7.87%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.06%

-19.51%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.03%

-28.26%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.71%

-0.35%

-3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.17%

-6.31%

-13.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

1.66%

+2.02%

Volatility

EEMO vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a higher volatility of 14.18% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) at 4.56%. This indicates that EEMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMOJMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.18%

4.56%

+9.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.26%

11.56%

+10.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.58%

14.31%

+10.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.36%

18.65%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

20.13%

+1.46%

EEMO vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMO vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison

EEMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than JMOM's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.68%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.72%0.86%0.75%1.21%1.39%0.64%0.85%1.11%1.38%0.29%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMO and JMOM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMO has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to JMOM (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMO dropped -48.47% vs JMOM's -34.31%.

On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.24% vs 6.67% for EEMO. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JMOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.24% return vs 6.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EEMO.

EEMO has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.72% for JMOM.

EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EEMO and 0.12% for JMOM.

JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMO and JMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer