JMOM vs. QQQ
JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMOM returned 13.81%/yr vs 14.23%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JMOM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
JMOM vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMOM achieves a 19.05% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 12.26% return.
JMOM
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- 6M
- 15.79%
- YTD
- 19.05%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.00%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.68%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 24.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.23%
- 10Y*
- 20.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.83M | $12.92M | $9.17M | |
| $30.32B | $28.40B | $31.45B |
JMOM vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 19.05% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.36% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 12.26% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMOM and QQQ is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between JMOM and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
JMOM vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JMOM
QQQ
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
JMOM
QQQ
Industrials
JMOM
QQQ
Healthcare
JMOM
QQQ
Financial Services
JMOM
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
JMOM
QQQ
Communication Services
JMOM
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
JMOM
QQQ
Energy
JMOM
QQQ
Real Estate
JMOM
QQQ
Utilities
JMOM
QQQ
Basic Materials
JMOM
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMOM vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
JMOM
QQQ
JMOM vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMOM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.21 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 1.88 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.11 | 6.00 | +6.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMOM vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMOM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -82.97% | +48.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.02% | -11.96% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -22.77% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | -35.12% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.41% | -7.69% | +2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -32.62% | +26.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 3.74% | -1.59% |
Volatility
JMOM vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) is 5.37%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that JMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMOM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 6.87% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | 16.08% | -2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 19.38% | -2.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 22.90% | -3.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 22.50% | -2.32% |
JMOM vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JMOM vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than QQQ's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.75% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, JMOM and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQ has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to JMOM (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMOM dropped -34.31% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 14.23% vs 13.81% for JMOM. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JMOM has been the lower-risk option at 5.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 13.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
JMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.44% for QQQ.
JMOM is categorized as Momentum, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JMOM and 0.18% for QQQ.
JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMOM and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer