JMOM vs. QMOM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and QMOM (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. JMOM is passively managed, while QMOM is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMOM returned 15.10%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for QMOM. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JMOM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QMOM.

Performance

JMOM vs. QMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMOM achieves a 21.70% return, which is significantly higher than QMOM's 19.77% return.

JMOM

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: 2.90%
• YTD: 21.70%
• 6M: 19.91%
• 1Y: 34.10%
• 3Y*: 27.39%
• 5Y*: 15.10%
• 10Y*: —

QMOM

• 1D: -2.68%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: 19.77%
• 6M: 17.29%
• 1Y: 23.83%
• 3Y*: 21.42%
• 5Y*: 10.17%
• 10Y*: 13.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMOM vs. QMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	21.70%	18.02%	28.47%	22.89%	-20.83%	25.03%	29.25%	28.24%	-5.25%	3.36%
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	19.77%	2.36%	30.43%	9.50%	-6.99%	-4.06%	61.94%	28.39%	-11.75%	0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between JMOM and QMOM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017	0.79

The correlation between JMOM and QMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

JMOM vs. QMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JMOM	QMOM
Technology	43.1%	24.6%
Industrials	12.0%	25.6%
Financial Services	9.0%	1.9%
Healthcare	8.1%	8.0%
Communication Services	7.7%	2.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	2.0%
Energy	3.3%	16.0%
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Utilities	2.0%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.3%	15.9%

Return for Risk

JMOM vs. QMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMOM

JMOM Risk / Return Rank: 76
JMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
JMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
JMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 68
JMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
JMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

QMOM

QMOM Risk / Return Rank: 33
QMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
QMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
QMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 28
QMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
QMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMOM vs. QMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JMOM	QMOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	0.97	+1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	1.43	+1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.19	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.35	1.89	+2.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.57	6.64	+12.93

JMOM vs. QMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the QMOM Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMOM and QMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JMOM vs. QMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum QMOM drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and QMOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMOM	QMOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.31%	-39.13%	+4.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.87%	-12.65%	+4.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.51%	-26.46%	+6.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.26%	-26.82%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.53%	-4.27%	+1.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-12.89%	+6.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	3.60%	-1.85%

Volatility

JMOM vs. QMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) is 7.29%, while Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) has a volatility of 9.55%. This indicates that JMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMOM	QMOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.29%	9.55%	-2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.12%	21.17%	-8.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.69%	24.71%	-9.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.87%	24.42%	-5.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.19%	26.62%	-6.43%

JMOM vs. QMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than QMOM's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

JMOM vs. QMOM - Dividend Comparison

JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than QMOM's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	0.72%	0.86%	0.75%	1.21%	1.39%	0.64%	0.85%	1.11%	1.38%	0.29%	0.00%
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	0.45%	0.54%	1.40%	0.87%	1.59%	0.12%	0.08%	0.01%	0.05%	0.13%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMOM and QMOM in my portfolio?

JMOM and QMOM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JMOM or QMOM?

QMOM has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to JMOM (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMOM dropped -34.31% vs QMOM's -39.13%.

Which ETF is better, JMOM or QMOM?

On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 15.10% vs 10.17% for QMOM. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JMOM has been the lower-risk option at 7.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JMOM or QMOM?

Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMOM or QMOM?

JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QMOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMOM or QMOM?

JMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.45% for QMOM.

What is the main difference between JMOM and QMOM?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JMOM and 0.28% for QMOM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.