PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMOM vs. BIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMOM vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JMOM having a 22.99% return and BIBL slightly higher at 23.32%.


JMOM

1D
1.09%
1M
9.44%
YTD
22.99%
6M
22.95%
1Y
37.89%
3Y*
28.44%
5Y*
16.54%
10Y*

BIBL

1D
1.99%
1M
4.57%
YTD
23.32%
6M
23.29%
1Y
40.78%
3Y*
22.03%
5Y*
10.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMOM vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
22.99%18.02%28.47%22.89%-20.83%25.03%29.25%28.24%-5.25%3.32%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
23.32%17.27%12.49%17.87%-23.26%27.44%22.62%29.68%-7.64%4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between JMOM and BIBL is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.86

The correlation between JMOM and BIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

JMOM vs. BIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JMOM
BIBL

Technology

38.1%
30.1%

Industrials

12.8%
26.8%

Financial Services

9.6%
8.3%

Healthcare

8.7%
4.3%

Communication Services

8.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
0.5%

Energy

3.8%
6.9%

Real Estate

2.5%
14.7%

Utilities

2.3%
3.5%

Basic Materials

1.3%
4.2%

Technology

JMOM
38.1%
BIBL
30.1%

Industrials

JMOM
12.8%
BIBL
26.8%

Financial Services

JMOM
9.6%
BIBL
8.3%

Healthcare

JMOM
8.7%
BIBL
4.3%

Communication Services

JMOM
8.3%
BIBL

-

Consumer Cyclical

JMOM
6.9%
BIBL
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

JMOM
5.7%
BIBL
0.5%

Energy

JMOM
3.8%
BIBL
6.9%

Real Estate

JMOM
2.5%
BIBL
14.7%

Utilities

JMOM
2.3%
BIBL
3.5%

Basic Materials

JMOM
1.3%
BIBL
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMOM vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMOM
JMOM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
JMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
JMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BIBL
BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMOM vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMOMBIBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.66

2.65

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.63

3.56

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.92

4.65

+0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.34

20.17

+3.17

JMOM vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMOM and BIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMOMBIBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.65

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.52

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.62

+0.20

Drawdowns

JMOM vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and BIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMOMBIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.31%

-36.12%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.87%

-8.94%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.51%

-20.60%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.26%

-30.85%

+2.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.32%

-7.04%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

2.06%

-0.40%

Volatility

JMOM vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) have volatilities of 4.61% and 4.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMOMBIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

4.70%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

12.66%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

15.48%

-1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.66%

19.59%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.13%

21.08%

-0.95%

JMOM vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMOM vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than BIBL's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
0.96%1.01%0.92%1.02%0.98%17.87%1.67%1.30%1.49%0.31%
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.71%0.86%0.75%1.21%1.39%0.64%0.85%1.11%1.38%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMOM and BIBL have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIBL has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to JMOM (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMOM dropped -34.31% vs BIBL's -36.12%.

On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.54% vs 10.20% for BIBL. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.54% return vs 10.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BIBL.

BIBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.71% for JMOM.

JMOM is categorized as Momentum, while BIBL is Large Cap Growth Equities. JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while BIBL tracks Inspire 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JMOM and 0.35% for BIBL.

JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMOM and BIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer