JMOM vs. BIBL
JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and BIBL (Inspire 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while BIBL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Inspire 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMOM returned 16.54%/yr vs 10.20%/yr for BIBL. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JMOM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BIBL.
Performance
JMOM vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JMOM having a 22.99% return and BIBL slightly higher at 23.32%.
JMOM
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 9.44%
- YTD
- 22.99%
- 6M
- 22.95%
- 1Y
- 37.89%
- 3Y*
- 28.44%
- 5Y*
- 16.54%
- 10Y*
- —
BIBL
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 6M
- 23.29%
- 1Y
- 40.78%
- 3Y*
- 22.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- —
JMOM vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 22.99% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.32% |
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF | 23.32% | 17.27% | 12.49% | 17.87% | -23.26% | 27.44% | 22.62% | 29.68% | -7.64% | 4.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMOM and BIBL is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between JMOM and BIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
JMOM vs. BIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JMOM
BIBL
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
JMOM
BIBL
Industrials
JMOM
BIBL
Financial Services
JMOM
BIBL
Healthcare
JMOM
BIBL
Communication Services
JMOM
BIBL
-
Consumer Cyclical
JMOM
BIBL
Consumer Defensive
JMOM
BIBL
Energy
JMOM
BIBL
Real Estate
JMOM
BIBL
Utilities
JMOM
BIBL
Basic Materials
JMOM
BIBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMOM vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank
JMOM
BIBL
JMOM vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMOM | BIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.66 | 2.65 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.63 | 3.56 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.46 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.92 | 4.65 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.34 | 20.17 | +3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMOM | BIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 2.65 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.52 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.62 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
JMOM vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and BIBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMOM | BIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -36.12% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | -8.94% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -20.60% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | -30.85% | +2.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -7.04% | +0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 2.06% | -0.40% |
Volatility
JMOM vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) have volatilities of 4.61% and 4.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMOM | BIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 4.70% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 12.66% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.32% | 15.48% | -1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 19.59% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 21.08% | -0.95% |
JMOM vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMOM vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison
JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than BIBL's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF | 0.96% | 1.01% | 0.92% | 1.02% | 0.98% | 17.87% | 1.67% | 1.30% | 1.49% | 0.31% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.71% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMOM and BIBL have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIBL has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to JMOM (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMOM dropped -34.31% vs BIBL's -36.12%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.54% vs 10.20% for BIBL. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.54% return vs 10.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BIBL.
BIBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.71% for JMOM.
JMOM is categorized as Momentum, while BIBL is Large Cap Growth Equities. JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while BIBL tracks Inspire 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JMOM and 0.35% for BIBL.
JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMOM and BIBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer