PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMOM vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMOM vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMOM achieves a 22.79% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.


JMOM

1D
-0.17%
1M
9.35%
YTD
22.79%
6M
22.27%
1Y
36.77%
3Y*
28.37%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*

MTUM

1D
1.06%
1M
15.90%
YTD
31.75%
6M
32.38%
1Y
41.76%
3Y*
34.75%
5Y*
15.21%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMOM vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
22.79%18.02%28.47%22.89%-20.83%25.03%29.25%28.24%-5.25%3.32%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.75%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%3.23%

Correlation

The correlation between JMOM and MTUM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.86

The correlation between JMOM and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

JMOM vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JMOM
MTUM

Technology

38.1%
44.4%

Industrials

12.8%
15.6%

Financial Services

9.6%
10.4%

Healthcare

8.7%
6.9%

Communication Services

8.3%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
3.3%

Energy

3.8%
3.5%

Real Estate

2.5%
1.8%

Utilities

2.3%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.3%
1.7%

Technology

JMOM
38.1%
MTUM
44.4%

Industrials

JMOM
12.8%
MTUM
15.6%

Financial Services

JMOM
9.6%
MTUM
10.4%

Healthcare

JMOM
8.7%
MTUM
6.9%

Communication Services

JMOM
8.3%
MTUM
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

JMOM
6.9%
MTUM
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

JMOM
5.7%
MTUM
3.3%

Energy

JMOM
3.8%
MTUM
3.5%

Real Estate

JMOM
2.5%
MTUM
1.8%

Utilities

JMOM
2.3%
MTUM
1.6%

Basic Materials

JMOM
1.3%
MTUM
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMOM vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMOM
JMOM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
JMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMOM vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMOMMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.39

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

3.64

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.24

14.50

+7.74

JMOM vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMOM and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMOMMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.20

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.74

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.85

-0.03

Drawdowns

JMOM vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, roughly equal to the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMOMMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.31%

-34.08%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.87%

-11.54%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.51%

-20.99%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.26%

-32.28%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

0.00%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.32%

-6.21%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

2.89%

-1.23%

Volatility

JMOM vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) is 4.62%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that JMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMOMMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

7.68%

-3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

16.46%

-4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

19.04%

-4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

20.60%

-1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.13%

21.03%

-0.90%

JMOM vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JMOM vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.71%0.86%0.75%1.21%1.39%0.64%0.85%1.11%1.38%0.29%0.00%0.00%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, JMOM and MTUM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to JMOM (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMOM dropped -34.31% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.28% vs 15.21% for MTUM. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JMOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 15.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.

JMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.

JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JMOM and 0.15% for MTUM.

JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMOM and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer