DRUP vs. CCOR
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR).
DRUP and CCOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DRUP is a passively managed fund by GraniteShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 7, 2019. CCOR is an actively managed fund by Core Alternative Capital. It was launched on May 24, 2017.
Performance
DRUP vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DRUP vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | -18.03% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -28.18% | 26.13% | 28.71% | 11.32% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | -0.34% | 3.52% | -5.70% | -11.92% | 2.51% | 9.90% | 4.07% | 2.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRUP achieves a -18.03% return, which is significantly lower than CCOR's -0.34% return.
DRUP
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -18.03%
- 6M
- -16.05%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- —
CCOR
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- -1.48%
- 3Y*
- -3.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.93%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DRUP vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRUP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DRUP vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank
DRUP
CCOR
DRUP vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRUP | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.22 | -0.14 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | -0.14 | +0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.98 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | -0.19 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.68 | -0.35 | +1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRUP | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | -0.14 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | -0.08 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.15 | +0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between DRUP and CCOR is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DRUP vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison
DRUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
DRUP vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRUP drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP and CCOR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRUP | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -22.99% | -8.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -9.17% | -14.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -22.99% | -8.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.44% | -17.23% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -7.07% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.10% | 4.95% | +2.15% |
Volatility
DRUP vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.17%. This indicates that DRUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DRUP | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 2.17% | +4.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 5.44% | +8.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.87% | 10.74% | +13.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 11.13% | +10.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.17% | 10.81% | +12.36% |