DRUP vs. AMDL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DRUP (GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRUP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while AMDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. DRUP is passively managed, while AMDL is actively managed. Over the past year, DRUP returned -0.34% vs 835.61% for AMDL. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRUP charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for AMDL.

Performance

DRUP vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRUP achieves a -10.33% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 330.80% return.

DRUP

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -4.09%
• YTD: -10.33%
• 6M: -11.73%
• 1Y: -0.34%
• 3Y*: 15.07%
• 5Y*: 8.53%
• 10Y*: —

AMDL

• 1D: -11.53%
• 1M: 15.74%
• YTD: 330.80%
• 6M: 327.23%
• 1Y: 835.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRUP vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF	-10.33%	18.18%	15.48%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	330.80%	103.00%	-69.97%

Correlation

The correlation between DRUP and AMDL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024	0.43

The correlation between DRUP and AMDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DRUP vs. AMDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DRUP	AMDL
Technology	60.3%	66.6%
Healthcare	18.6%	-
Communication Services	17.7%	-
Financial Services	1.2%	-
Industrials	1.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DRUP vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRUP

DRUP Risk / Return Rank: 9
DRUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DRUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DRUP Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DRUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
DRUP Martin Ratio Rank: 9

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 94
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRUP vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRUP	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.02	6.28	-6.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.11	4.08	-3.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.53	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.01	15.04	-15.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.04	29.24	-29.28

DRUP vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRUP Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the AMDL Sharpe Ratio of 6.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRUP and AMDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DRUP vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRUP drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP and AMDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRUP	AMDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.29%	-88.63%	+57.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.21%	-56.13%	+32.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.97%	-13.00%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.42%	-47.74%	+39.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.55%	28.81%	-19.26%

Volatility

DRUP vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) is 8.52%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 48.98%. This indicates that DRUP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRUP	AMDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.52%	48.98%	-40.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.61%	102.19%	-85.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.02%	134.44%	-114.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.87%	118.50%	-96.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.22%	118.50%	-95.28%

DRUP vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRUP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRUP vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRUP nor AMDL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.40%	0.51%	0.28%	0.53%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRUP and AMDL in my portfolio?

DRUP and AMDL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRUP or AMDL?

AMDL has higher volatility (48.98%) compared to DRUP (8.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRUP dropped -31.29% vs AMDL's -88.63%.

Which ETF is better, DRUP or AMDL?

On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 835.61% vs -0.34% for DRUP. On fees, DRUP is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DRUP has been the lower-risk option at 8.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DRUP or AMDL?

Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 835.61% return vs -0.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRUP or AMDL?

DRUP is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRUP or AMDL?

DRUP and AMDL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DRUP and AMDL?

DRUP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AMDL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DRUP and 1.15% for AMDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.28 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.