PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMDL vs. AMUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMDL vs. AMUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AMDL having a 232.67% return and AMUU slightly higher at 236.52%.


AMDL

1D
-3.34%
1M
-20.60%
6M
179.62%
YTD
232.67%
1Y
325.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
34.79%

AMUU

1D
-3.78%
1M
-20.79%
6M
183.05%
YTD
236.52%
1Y
328.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
332.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$184.60M$207.34M$361.62M
$20.61M$22.17M$28.17M

AMDL vs. AMUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
232.67%148.80%
AMUU
Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares
236.52%153.20%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDL and AMUU is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2025

1.00

The correlation between AMDL and AMUU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

AMDL vs. AMUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMDL
AMUU

Technology

66.7%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AMDL
66.7%
AMUU
100.0%

Basic Materials

AMDL

-

AMUU

-

Communication Services

AMDL

-

AMUU

-

Consumer Cyclical

AMDL

-

AMUU

-

Consumer Defensive

AMDL

-

AMUU

-

Energy

AMDL

-

AMUU

-

Financial Services

AMDL

-

AMUU

-

Healthcare

AMDL

-

AMUU

-

Industrials

AMDL

-

AMUU

-

Real Estate

AMDL

-

AMUU

-

Utilities

AMDL

-

AMUU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMDL vs. AMUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMDL
AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

AMUU
AMUU Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AMUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMUU Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AMUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMUU Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMDL vs. AMUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMDLAMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.44

5.46

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.24

10.30

-0.06

AMDL vs. AMUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the AMUU Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDL and AMUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMDL vs. AMUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDL drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than AMUU's maximum drawdown of -56.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDL and AMUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMDLAMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.63%

-56.47%

-32.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.13%

-56.31%

+0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.49%

-36.90%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.51%

-22.28%

-24.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.74%

29.82%

-0.08%

Volatility

AMDL vs. AMUU - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) have volatilities of 48.46% and 48.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMDLAMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.46%

48.41%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

112.40%

112.17%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

142.48%

142.44%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

120.98%

136.02%

-15.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

120.98%

136.02%

-15.04%

AMDL vs. AMUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than AMUU's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMDL vs. AMUU - Dividend Comparison

AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, AMDL and AMUU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AMDL has higher volatility (48.46%) compared to AMUU (48.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDL dropped -88.63% vs AMUU's -56.47%.

On 1-year performance, AMUU leads with 328.67% vs 325.41% for AMDL. On fees, AMUU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMUU has performed better with a 328.67% return vs 325.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMUU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AMDL.

AMUU has the higher dividend yield at 4.47%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AMDL and 0.97% for AMUU.

AMUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMDL and AMUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer