PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMDL vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMDL vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDL achieves a 386.95% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 9.45% return.


AMDL

1D
5.43%
1M
30.82%
YTD
386.95%
6M
382.29%
1Y
978.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AAPL

1D
-0.34%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
9.45%
6M
9.81%
1Y
48.35%
3Y*
17.28%
5Y*
17.91%
10Y*
30.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDL vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
386.95%103.00%-69.97%
AAPL
Apple Inc
9.45%9.05%45.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDL and AAPL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMDL vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDL
AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDL vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMDLAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.39

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.62

3.52

+14.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.27

8.68

+25.60

AMDL vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDL Sharpe Ratio is 7.39, which is higher than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDL and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMDL vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDL drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDL and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMDLAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.63%

-81.80%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.13%

-13.80%

-42.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-5.77%

+4.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.80%

-29.58%

-18.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.80%

5.59%

+23.21%

Volatility

AMDL vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a higher volatility of 46.96% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 7.01%. This indicates that AMDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMDLAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.96%

7.01%

+39.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.28%

16.59%

+84.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

134.09%

22.59%

+111.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

118.34%

27.52%

+90.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

118.34%

28.94%

+89.40%

Dividends

AMDL vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMDL and AAPL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDL has higher volatility (46.96%) compared to AAPL (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDL dropped -88.63% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.39 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMDL and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer