AMDL vs. AMDG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) and AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AMDL is passively managed, while AMDG is actively managed. Over the past year, AMDL returned 325.41% vs 319.90% for AMDG. Their 1.00 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. AMDL charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMDG.

Performance

AMDL vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AMDL having a 232.67% return and AMDG slightly lower at 230.68%.

AMDL

• 1D: -3.34%
• 1M: -20.60%
• 6M: 179.62%
• YTD: 232.67%
• 1Y: 325.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 34.79%

AMDG

• 1D: -3.81%
• 1M: -20.14%
• 6M: 179.34%
• YTD: 230.68%
• 1Y: 319.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 243.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	$8.00M	$7.90M	$8.98M
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	$184.60M	$207.34M	$361.62M

AMDL vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	232.67%	98.85%
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	230.68%	95.49%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDL and AMDG is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025	1.00

The correlation between AMDL and AMDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMDL vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 86
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 83
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 80

AMDG

AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 86
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 82
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMDL vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMDL	AMDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	2.10	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	2.81	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.35	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.44	5.31	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.24	9.98	+0.26

AMDL vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the AMDG Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDL and AMDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMDL vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDL drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDL and AMDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDL	AMDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.63%	-63.32%	-25.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.13%	-56.48%	+0.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.49%	-37.43%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.51%	-25.05%	-21.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.74%	29.98%	-0.24%

Volatility

AMDL vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) have volatilities of 48.46% and 49.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDL	AMDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	48.46%	49.04%	-0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	112.40%	113.22%	-0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	142.48%	142.79%	-0.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	120.98%	135.20%	-14.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	120.98%	135.20%	-14.22%

AMDL vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDL vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	3.39%	11.21%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDL and AMDG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, AMDL and AMDG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AMDL or AMDG?

AMDG has higher volatility (49.04%) compared to AMDL (48.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDL dropped -88.63% vs AMDG's -63.32%.

Which ETF is better, AMDL or AMDG?

On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 325.41% vs 319.90% for AMDG. On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AMDL has been the lower-risk option at 48.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMDL or AMDG?

Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 325.41% return vs 319.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDL or AMDG?

AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AMDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDL or AMDG?

AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

What is the main difference between AMDL and AMDG?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AMDL and 0.75% for AMDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.