DOG vs. NOBL
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL).
DOG and NOBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DOG is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the DJ Industrial Average (-100%). It was launched on Jun 19, 2006. NOBL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. Both DOG and NOBL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DOG vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DOG vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 4.40% | -8.40% | -5.62% | -7.05% | 5.67% | -19.21% | -20.45% | -18.43% | 3.55% | -21.51% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.36% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOG achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 2.36% return. Over the past 10 years, DOG has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of -10.49%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.54% annualized return.
DOG
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 4.40%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- -6.66%
- 3Y*
- -5.84%
- 5Y*
- -4.72%
- 10Y*
- -10.49%
NOBL
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- -7.04%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 6M
- 4.01%
- 1Y
- 6.06%
- 3Y*
- 7.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DOG vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DOG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DOG vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
DOG
NOBL
DOG vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DOG | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | 0.40 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | 0.68 | -1.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.09 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 0.66 | -1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 2.36 | -2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DOG | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 | 0.40 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | 0.44 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.60 | 0.58 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.55 | 0.64 | -1.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between DOG and NOBL is -0.87. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
DOG vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than NOBL's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.21% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.14% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Drawdowns
DOG vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOG drawdown since its inception was -92.59%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOG and NOBL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOG | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.59% | -35.43% | -57.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.70% | -11.20% | -11.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.06% | -17.92% | -15.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.38% | -35.43% | -34.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.95% | -7.04% | -84.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.16% | -3.45% | -62.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.48% | 3.15% | +13.33% |
Volatility
DOG vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.61%. This indicates that DOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DOG | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 3.61% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.24% | 8.07% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.82% | 15.29% | +1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 14.40% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 16.60% | +0.86% |