DOG vs. UDOW
DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) and UDOW (ProShares UltraPro Dow30) are both exchange-traded funds - DOG is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while UDOW is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DOG returned -11.50%/yr vs 24.83%/yr for UDOW. At a correlation of -0.99, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
DOG vs. UDOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOG achieves a -5.82% return, which is significantly lower than UDOW's 17.97% return. Over the past 10 years, DOG has underperformed UDOW with an annualized return of -11.50%, while UDOW has yielded a comparatively higher 24.83% annualized return.
DOG
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- -5.82%
- 6M
- -5.09%
- 1Y
- -15.17%
- 3Y*
- -8.99%
- 5Y*
- -6.11%
- 10Y*
- -11.50%
UDOW
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 17.97%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- 1Y
- 65.66%
- 3Y*
- 35.65%
- 5Y*
- 15.69%
- 10Y*
- 24.83%
DOG vs. UDOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -5.82% | -8.40% | -5.62% | -7.05% | 5.67% | -19.21% | -20.45% | -18.43% | 3.55% | -21.51% |
UDOW ProShares UltraPro Dow30 | 17.97% | 24.46% | 28.47% | 32.72% | -32.39% | 65.67% | -17.15% | 75.24% | -23.86% | 99.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOG and UDOW is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.99 |
The correlation between DOG and UDOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
DOG vs. UDOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DOG
UDOW
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
DOG
UDOW
Basic Materials
DOG
-
UDOW
Communication Services
DOG
-
UDOW
Consumer Cyclical
DOG
-
UDOW
Consumer Defensive
DOG
-
UDOW
Energy
DOG
-
UDOW
Healthcare
DOG
-
UDOW
Industrials
DOG
-
UDOW
Real Estate
DOG
-
UDOW
-
Technology
DOG
-
UDOW
Utilities
DOG
-
UDOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOG vs. UDOW — Risk / Return Rank
DOG
UDOW
DOG vs. UDOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DOG | UDOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.29 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.02 | 2.35 | -3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.76 | 8.33 | -10.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DOG vs. UDOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOG drawdown since its inception was -92.79%, which is greater than UDOW's maximum drawdown of -80.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOG and UDOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOG | UDOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.79% | -80.29% | -12.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -28.07% | +13.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.71% | -44.83% | +15.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.86% | -55.79% | +20.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.17% | -80.29% | +9.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.74% | -1.90% | -90.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.44% | -14.35% | -52.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.43% | 7.91% | +1.52% |
Volatility
DOG vs. UDOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) is 4.17%, while ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) has a volatility of 12.48%. This indicates that DOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UDOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOG | UDOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 12.48% | -8.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 29.07% | -19.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.47% | 37.16% | -24.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 44.33% | -29.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 51.87% | -34.35% |
DOG vs. UDOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DOG and UDOW have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
DOG vs. UDOW - Dividend Comparison
DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than UDOW's 1.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.55% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UDOW ProShares UltraPro Dow30 | 1.15% | 1.38% | 0.95% | 0.95% | 0.83% | 0.26% | 0.19% | 0.61% | 0.73% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DOG and UDOW have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UDOW has higher volatility (12.48%) compared to DOG (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOG dropped -92.79% vs UDOW's -80.29%.
On 10-year performance, UDOW leads with 24.83% vs -11.50% for DOG. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UDOW has performed better with a 24.83% return vs -11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOG and UDOW have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 1.15% for UDOW.
DOG is categorized as Inverse Equities, while UDOW is Leveraged Equities. DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while UDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%).
UDOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOG and UDOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer