PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DOG vs. DIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DOG vs. DIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOG achieves a -5.82% return, which is significantly lower than DIA's 8.40% return. Over the past 10 years, DOG has underperformed DIA with an annualized return of -11.50%, while DIA has yielded a comparatively higher 13.70% annualized return.


DOG

1D
-0.27%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
-5.82%
6M
-5.09%
1Y
-15.17%
3Y*
-8.99%
5Y*
-6.11%
10Y*
-11.50%

DIA

1D
0.30%
1M
2.44%
YTD
8.40%
6M
7.75%
1Y
24.46%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
13.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOG vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DOG
ProShares Short Dow30
-5.82%-8.40%-5.62%-7.05%5.67%-19.21%-20.45%-18.43%3.55%-21.51%
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
8.40%14.71%14.82%16.02%-7.02%20.83%9.59%24.70%-3.74%28.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DOG and DIA is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006

-0.99

The correlation between DOG and DIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

DOG vs. DIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DOG
DIA

Financial Services

82.9%
27.3%

Basic Materials

-

3.7%

Communication Services

-

1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.1%

Energy

-

2.2%

Healthcare

-

12.8%

Industrials

-

18.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

19.1%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

DOG
82.9%
DIA
27.3%

Basic Materials

DOG

-

DIA
3.7%

Communication Services

DOG

-

DIA
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DOG

-

DIA
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

DOG

-

DIA
4.1%

Energy

DOG

-

DIA
2.2%

Healthcare

DOG

-

DIA
12.8%

Industrials

DOG

-

DIA
18.1%

Real Estate

DOG

-

DIA

-

Technology

DOG

-

DIA
19.1%

Utilities

DOG

-

DIA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DOG vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOG
DOG Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
DOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
DOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOG Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

DIA
DIA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOG vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DOGDIADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.35

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.02

2.52

-3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.76

9.72

-11.48

DOG vs. DIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOG Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the DIA Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOG and DIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DOG vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOG drawdown since its inception was -92.79%, which is greater than DIA's maximum drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOG and DIA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DOGDIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.79%

-51.87%

-40.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.95%

-9.76%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.71%

-15.95%

-13.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.86%

-20.76%

-14.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.17%

-36.70%

-34.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.74%

-0.57%

-92.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.44%

-7.13%

-59.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.43%

2.52%

+6.91%

Volatility

DOG vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) have volatilities of 4.17% and 4.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DOGDIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

4.16%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

9.76%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

12.45%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

14.84%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

17.57%

-0.05%

DOG vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DOG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

DOG vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison

DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than DIA's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
1.39%1.43%1.61%1.81%1.91%1.58%1.87%1.85%2.24%1.97%2.26%2.33%
DOG
ProShares Short Dow30
3.55%3.65%5.72%4.54%0.41%0.00%0.14%1.54%0.86%0.04%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DOG and DIA have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DOG has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to DIA (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOG dropped -92.79% vs DIA's -51.87%.

On 10-year performance, DIA leads with 13.70% vs -11.50% for DOG. On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DIA has performed better with a 13.70% return vs -11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DOG.

DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 1.39% for DIA.

DOG is categorized as Inverse Equities, while DIA is Large Cap Blend Equities. DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while DIA tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DOG and 0.16% for DIA.

DIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DOG and DIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer