PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEM vs. PIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEM vs. PIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEM achieves a 27.92% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 38.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DBEM having a 10.69% annualized return and PIE not far behind at 10.46%.


DBEM

1D
-5.21%
1M
2.97%
YTD
27.92%
6M
28.44%
1Y
54.61%
3Y*
24.78%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
10.69%

PIE

1D
-5.18%
1M
2.84%
YTD
38.60%
6M
34.63%
1Y
63.22%
3Y*
23.20%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEM vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
27.92%30.42%10.61%10.53%-17.00%-2.26%18.12%16.77%-10.81%27.10%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
38.60%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEM and PIE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011

0.75

The correlation between DBEM and PIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEM vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEM
PIE

Technology

43.6%
51.1%

Financial Services

17.9%
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
1.4%

Industrials

6.7%
15.3%

Communication Services

6.1%
1.3%

Basic Materials

6.0%
2.9%

Energy

3.5%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
0.3%

Healthcare

2.5%
4.3%

Utilities

1.8%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.0%
3.5%

Technology

DBEM
43.6%
PIE
51.1%

Financial Services

DBEM
17.9%
PIE
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEM
8.4%
PIE
1.4%

Industrials

DBEM
6.7%
PIE
15.3%

Communication Services

DBEM
6.1%
PIE
1.3%

Basic Materials

DBEM
6.0%
PIE
2.9%

Energy

DBEM
3.5%
PIE
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

DBEM
2.5%
PIE
0.3%

Healthcare

DBEM
2.5%
PIE
4.3%

Utilities

DBEM
1.8%
PIE
1.1%

Real Estate

DBEM
1.0%
PIE
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEM vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEM
DBEM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEM vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBEMPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.47

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.22

6.44

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.15

20.03

-0.88

DBEM vs. PIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the PIE Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEM and PIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBEM vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEM drawdown since its inception was -33.51%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEM and PIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEMPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.51%

-72.98%

+39.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.51%

-9.87%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

-28.69%

+13.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.48%

-40.32%

+9.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.51%

-40.32%

+6.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.21%

-5.18%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.66%

-26.01%

+14.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

3.17%

-0.31%

Volatility

DBEM vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) is 11.58%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 13.28%. This indicates that DBEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEMPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.58%

13.28%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.66%

21.21%

-2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.69%

24.30%

-3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.70%

20.85%

-3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

21.57%

-4.18%

DBEM vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEM vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison

DBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than PIE's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
2.06%1.84%2.48%2.55%2.65%1.77%1.74%2.59%2.85%1.51%1.59%3.49%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.74%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBEM and PIE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (13.28%) compared to DBEM (11.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEM dropped -33.51% vs PIE's -72.98%.

On 10-year performance, DBEM leads with 10.69% vs 10.46% for PIE. On fees, DBEM is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, DBEM has been the lower-risk option at 11.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBEM has performed better with a 10.69% return vs 10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBEM is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

DBEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.74% for PIE.

DBEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PIE is Momentum. DBEM tracks MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index, while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for DBEM and 0.90% for PIE.

DBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEM and PIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer