PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEM vs. SPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEM vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEM achieves a 34.95% return, which is significantly higher than SPEM's 14.64% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEM has outperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 11.28%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.96% annualized return.


DBEM

1D
0.66%
1M
8.63%
YTD
34.95%
6M
36.36%
1Y
63.96%
3Y*
27.03%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
11.28%

SPEM

1D
1.10%
1M
4.42%
YTD
14.64%
6M
15.36%
1Y
33.19%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEM vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
34.95%30.42%10.61%10.53%-17.00%-2.26%18.12%16.77%-10.81%27.10%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
14.64%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEM and SPEM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011

0.86

The correlation between DBEM and SPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEM vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEM
SPEM

Technology

43.6%
32.1%

Financial Services

17.9%
19.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
9.6%

Industrials

6.7%
8.3%

Communication Services

6.1%
6.7%

Basic Materials

6.0%
8.0%

Energy

3.5%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
3.6%

Healthcare

2.5%
3.7%

Utilities

1.8%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.8%

Technology

DBEM
43.6%
SPEM
32.1%

Financial Services

DBEM
17.9%
SPEM
19.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEM
8.4%
SPEM
9.6%

Industrials

DBEM
6.7%
SPEM
8.3%

Communication Services

DBEM
6.1%
SPEM
6.7%

Basic Materials

DBEM
6.0%
SPEM
8.0%

Energy

DBEM
3.5%
SPEM
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

DBEM
2.5%
SPEM
3.6%

Healthcare

DBEM
2.5%
SPEM
3.7%

Utilities

DBEM
1.8%
SPEM
2.8%

Real Estate

DBEM
1.0%
SPEM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEM vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEM
DBEM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEM vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBEMSPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.37

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.12

2.93

+3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.57

10.51

+12.06

DBEM vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEM Sharpe Ratio is 3.22, which is higher than the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEM and SPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBEM vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEM drawdown since its inception was -33.51%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEM and SPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEMSPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.51%

-64.41%

+30.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.51%

-11.36%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

-17.62%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.48%

-31.75%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.51%

-36.06%

+2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.66%

-14.72%

+3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

3.16%

-0.32%

Volatility

DBEM vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) at 6.73%. This indicates that DBEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEMSPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.09%

6.73%

+3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.84%

14.43%

+3.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.01%

16.77%

+3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

17.30%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

18.84%

-1.49%

DBEM vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEM vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

DBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than SPEM's 3.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
1.96%1.84%2.48%2.55%2.65%1.77%1.74%2.59%2.85%1.51%1.59%3.49%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
3.44%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, DBEM and SPEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DBEM has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to SPEM (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEM dropped -33.51% vs SPEM's -64.41%.

On 10-year performance, DBEM leads with 11.28% vs 9.96% for SPEM. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBEM has performed better with a 11.28% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPEM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DBEM.

SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 1.96% for DBEM.

DBEM tracks MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index, while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for DBEM and 0.07% for SPEM.

DBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEM and SPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer