DBEM vs. SPEM
DBEM (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF) and SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - DBEM tracks the MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index while SPEM tracks the S&P Emerging BMI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBEM returned 11.28%/yr vs 9.96%/yr for SPEM. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBEM charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SPEM.
Performance
DBEM vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEM achieves a 34.95% return, which is significantly higher than SPEM's 14.64% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEM has outperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 11.28%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.96% annualized return.
DBEM
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 8.63%
- YTD
- 34.95%
- 6M
- 36.36%
- 1Y
- 63.96%
- 3Y*
- 27.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
SPEM
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 14.64%
- 6M
- 15.36%
- 1Y
- 33.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
DBEM vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 34.95% | 30.42% | 10.61% | 10.53% | -17.00% | -2.26% | 18.12% | 16.77% | -10.81% | 27.10% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 14.64% | 25.63% | 11.40% | 10.51% | -17.90% | 1.51% | 14.55% | 19.69% | -13.26% | 34.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEM and SPEM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011 | 0.86 |
The correlation between DBEM and SPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
DBEM vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBEM
SPEM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DBEM
SPEM
Financial Services
DBEM
SPEM
Consumer Cyclical
DBEM
SPEM
Industrials
DBEM
SPEM
Communication Services
DBEM
SPEM
Basic Materials
DBEM
SPEM
Energy
DBEM
SPEM
Consumer Defensive
DBEM
SPEM
Healthcare
DBEM
SPEM
Utilities
DBEM
SPEM
Real Estate
DBEM
SPEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEM vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank
DBEM
SPEM
DBEM vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBEM | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.37 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.12 | 2.93 | +3.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.57 | 10.51 | +12.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBEM vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEM drawdown since its inception was -33.51%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEM and SPEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEM | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.51% | -64.41% | +30.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -11.36% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.12% | -17.62% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.48% | -31.75% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.51% | -36.06% | +2.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.66% | -14.72% | +3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.16% | -0.32% |
Volatility
DBEM vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) at 6.73%. This indicates that DBEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEM | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.09% | 6.73% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.84% | 14.43% | +3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.01% | 16.77% | +3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 17.30% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 18.84% | -1.49% |
DBEM vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBEM vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison
DBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than SPEM's 3.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 1.96% | 1.84% | 2.48% | 2.55% | 2.65% | 1.77% | 1.74% | 2.59% | 2.85% | 1.51% | 1.59% | 3.49% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 3.44% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, DBEM and SPEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DBEM has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to SPEM (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEM dropped -33.51% vs SPEM's -64.41%.
On 10-year performance, DBEM leads with 11.28% vs 9.96% for SPEM. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBEM has performed better with a 11.28% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPEM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DBEM.
SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 1.96% for DBEM.
DBEM tracks MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index, while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for DBEM and 0.07% for SPEM.
DBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEM and SPEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer