PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIE vs. PIZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIE vs. PIZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIE achieves a 29.63% return, which is significantly higher than PIZ's 7.58% return. Over the past 10 years, PIE has underperformed PIZ with an annualized return of 8.78%, while PIZ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.07% annualized return.


PIE

1D
2.05%
1M
-6.22%
6M
19.42%
YTD
29.63%
1Y
45.94%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
5.41%
10Y*
8.78%
ALL TIME*
2.57%

PIZ

1D
1.13%
1M
-4.68%
6M
0.00%
YTD
7.58%
1Y
17.42%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
10.07%
ALL TIME*
5.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.91M$4.11M$2.85M
$5.38M$4.25M$4.38M

PIE vs. PIZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
29.63%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
7.58%37.22%16.30%17.96%-30.48%20.53%17.96%27.51%-16.15%30.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PIE and PIZ is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2008

0.71

The correlation between PIE and PIZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PIE vs. PIZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PIE
PIZ

Technology

52.7%
15.7%

Industrials

15.3%
46.9%

Financial Services

14.6%
27.8%

Energy

3.7%
1.5%

Real Estate

3.5%
0.4%

Healthcare

3.2%
0.7%

Basic Materials

2.9%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%
1.7%

Communication Services

1.3%

-

Utilities

1.2%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
1.9%

Technology

PIE
52.7%
PIZ
15.7%

Industrials

PIE
15.3%
PIZ
46.9%

Financial Services

PIE
14.6%
PIZ
27.8%

Energy

PIE
3.7%
PIZ
1.5%

Real Estate

PIE
3.5%
PIZ
0.4%

Healthcare

PIE
3.2%
PIZ
0.7%

Basic Materials

PIE
2.9%
PIZ
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PIE
1.5%
PIZ
1.7%

Communication Services

PIE
1.3%
PIZ

-

Utilities

PIE
1.2%
PIZ
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

PIE
0.2%
PIZ
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIE vs. PIZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PIZ
PIZ Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
PIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PIE vs. PIZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIEPIZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.14

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

1.10

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.63

3.41

+7.22

PIE vs. PIZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the PIZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIE and PIZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIE vs. PIZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than PIZ's maximum drawdown of -60.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and PIZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIEPIZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.98%

-60.61%

-12.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.26%

-15.97%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.69%

-15.97%

-12.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.02%

-40.93%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.32%

-40.93%

+0.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.32%

-11.41%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.90%

-14.86%

-11.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

5.13%

-0.79%

Volatility

PIE vs. PIZ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a higher volatility of 12.33% compared to Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) at 8.01%. This indicates that PIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIEPIZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.33%

8.01%

+4.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.97%

21.44%

+2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.21%

23.70%

+3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.35%

20.63%

+0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

19.71%

+2.16%

PIE vs. PIZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PIZ's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIE vs. PIZ - Dividend Comparison

PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than PIZ's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.87%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
1.60%1.55%1.68%1.86%2.04%1.01%0.37%1.58%1.06%1.30%2.21%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIE and PIZ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (12.33%) compared to PIZ (8.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs PIZ's -60.61%.

On 10-year performance, PIZ leads with 10.07% vs 8.78% for PIE. On fees, PIZ is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, PIZ has been the lower-risk option at 8.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PIZ has performed better with a 10.07% return vs 8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PIZ is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.60% for PIZ.

PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while PIZ tracks Dorsey Wright Developed Markets Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.80% for PIZ.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIE and PIZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer