PIE vs. EEMO
PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) and EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PIE tracks the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index while EEMO tracks the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PIE returned 10.46%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for EEMO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EEMO.
Performance
PIE vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIE achieves a 38.60% return, which is significantly higher than EEMO's 35.52% return. Over the past 10 years, PIE has outperformed EEMO with an annualized return of 10.46%, while EEMO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.71% annualized return.
PIE
- 1D
- -5.18%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 38.60%
- 6M
- 34.63%
- 1Y
- 63.22%
- 3Y*
- 23.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
EEMO
- 1D
- -8.31%
- 1M
- 6.72%
- YTD
- 35.52%
- 6M
- 35.05%
- 1Y
- 47.55%
- 3Y*
- 23.13%
- 5Y*
- 6.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
PIE vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 38.60% | 25.98% | -0.27% | 13.71% | -28.77% | 14.30% | 21.23% | 26.11% | -22.04% | 41.80% |
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 35.52% | 10.99% | 9.88% | 13.90% | -18.73% | -5.57% | 9.66% | 21.17% | -17.24% | 49.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIE and EEMO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012 | 0.65 |
The correlation between PIE and EEMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
PIE vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PIE
EEMO
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Technology
PIE
EEMO
Industrials
PIE
EEMO
Financial Services
PIE
EEMO
Energy
PIE
EEMO
Healthcare
PIE
EEMO
Real Estate
PIE
EEMO
Basic Materials
PIE
EEMO
Consumer Cyclical
PIE
EEMO
Communication Services
PIE
EEMO
Utilities
PIE
EEMO
Consumer Defensive
PIE
EEMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIE vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank
PIE
EEMO
PIE vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIE | EEMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.35 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.44 | 3.24 | +3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.03 | 11.80 | +8.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIE vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than EEMO's maximum drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and EEMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIE | EEMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.98% | -48.47% | -24.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.87% | -14.75% | +4.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.69% | -26.06% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.32% | -34.03% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.32% | -46.57% | +6.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.18% | -8.31% | +3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.01% | -20.11% | -5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 4.04% | -0.87% |
Volatility
PIE vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) is 13.28%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 20.47%. This indicates that PIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIE | EEMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.28% | 20.47% | -7.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.21% | 28.78% | -7.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.30% | 30.30% | -6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 20.93% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 22.33% | -0.76% |
PIE vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIE vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison
PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than EEMO's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.67% | 2.31% | 2.57% | 3.65% | 3.82% | 1.51% | 1.53% | 2.13% | 13.10% | 5.13% | 1.55% | 2.92% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.74% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIE and EEMO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMO has higher volatility (20.47%) compared to PIE (13.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs EEMO's -48.47%.
On 10-year performance, PIE leads with 10.46% vs 8.71% for EEMO. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, PIE has been the lower-risk option at 13.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PIE has performed better with a 10.46% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.67% for EEMO.
PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.31% for EEMO.
PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIE and EEMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer