PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIE vs. EEMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIE vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIE achieves a 27.02% return, which is significantly higher than EEMO's 13.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PIE has outperformed EEMO with an annualized return of 8.76%, while EEMO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.35% annualized return.


PIE

1D
2.51%
1M
-8.10%
6M
16.52%
YTD
27.02%
1Y
43.01%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
5.53%
10Y*
8.76%
ALL TIME*
2.46%

EEMO

1D
-0.40%
1M
-11.19%
6M
8.68%
YTD
13.88%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
6.35%
ALL TIME*
1.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$285.36K$494.03K$516.10K
$2.45M$4.43M$2.83M

PIE vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
27.02%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
13.88%10.99%9.88%13.90%-18.73%-5.57%9.66%21.17%-17.24%49.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PIE and EEMO is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012

0.65

The correlation between PIE and EEMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PIE vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PIE
EEMO

Technology

52.7%
56.8%

Industrials

15.3%
8.2%

Financial Services

14.6%
15.0%

Energy

3.7%
1.7%

Real Estate

3.5%
0.3%

Healthcare

3.2%
2.2%

Basic Materials

2.9%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%
2.6%

Communication Services

1.3%
1.3%

Utilities

1.2%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
0.9%

Technology

PIE
52.7%
EEMO
56.8%

Industrials

PIE
15.3%
EEMO
8.2%

Financial Services

PIE
14.6%
EEMO
15.0%

Energy

PIE
3.7%
EEMO
1.7%

Real Estate

PIE
3.5%
EEMO
0.3%

Healthcare

PIE
3.2%
EEMO
2.2%

Basic Materials

PIE
2.9%
EEMO
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PIE
1.5%
EEMO
2.6%

Communication Services

PIE
1.3%
EEMO
1.3%

Utilities

PIE
1.2%
EEMO
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

PIE
0.2%
EEMO
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIE vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PIE vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIEEEMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.15

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

0.72

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.20

2.94

+7.26

PIE vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIE and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIE vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than EEMO's maximum drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and EEMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIEEEMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.98%

-48.47%

-24.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.26%

-27.41%

+10.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.69%

-27.41%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.59%

-29.59%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.32%

-46.57%

+6.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.10%

-22.95%

+9.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.91%

-20.08%

-5.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

6.74%

-2.46%

Volatility

PIE vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) is 12.08%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 16.65%. This indicates that PIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIEEEMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.08%

16.65%

-4.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.13%

33.96%

-9.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.09%

35.14%

-8.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.34%

22.09%

-0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.86%

23.02%

-1.16%

PIE vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIE vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than EEMO's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.99%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.90%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIE and EEMO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMO has higher volatility (16.65%) compared to PIE (12.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

On 10-year performance, PIE leads with 8.76% vs 6.35% for EEMO. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, PIE has been the lower-risk option at 12.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PIE has performed better with a 8.76% return vs 6.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

EEMO has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.90% for PIE.

PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.31% for EEMO.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIE and EEMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer