Correlation
The correlation between DBEM and SLVP is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
DBEM vs. SLVP
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP).
DBEM and SLVP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DBEM is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index. It was launched on Jun 9, 2011. SLVP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. Both DBEM and SLVP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DBEM or SLVP.
Performance
DBEM vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
DBEM:
0.53
SLVP:
0.50
DBEM:
0.74
SLVP:
1.08
DBEM:
1.10
SLVP:
1.13
DBEM:
0.41
SLVP:
0.50
DBEM:
1.58
SLVP:
2.05
DBEM:
5.04%
SLVP:
11.98%
DBEM:
18.19%
SLVP:
42.52%
DBEM:
-33.50%
SLVP:
-80.47%
DBEM:
-7.12%
SLVP:
-28.74%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEM achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than SLVP's 35.01% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEM has underperformed SLVP with an annualized return of 3.87%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.11% annualized return.
DBEM
5.21%
3.58%
5.35%
9.54%
6.97%
6.63%
3.87%
SLVP
35.01%
2.50%
23.17%
21.21%
11.03%
5.68%
7.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBEM vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DBEM vs. SLVP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DBEM
SLVP
DBEM vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
DBEM vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
DBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than SLVP's 0.78% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 2.36% | 2.48% | 2.55% | 2.65% | 1.77% | 1.74% | 2.59% | 2.85% | 1.51% | 1.59% | 3.49% | 2.08% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF | 0.78% | 1.05% | 0.87% | 0.64% | 1.62% | 2.39% | 2.02% | 1.27% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.71% | 2.03% |
Drawdowns
DBEM vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEM drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEM and SLVP.
Loading data...
Volatility
DBEM vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) is 3.52%, while iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP) has a volatility of 14.24%. This indicates that DBEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...