PIE vs. PXH
PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) and PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PIE is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while PXH is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PIE returned 10.46%/yr vs 10.53%/yr for PXH. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PIE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PXH.
Performance
PIE vs. PXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIE achieves a 38.60% return, which is significantly higher than PXH's 10.82% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PIE having a 10.46% annualized return and PXH not far ahead at 10.53%.
PIE
- 1D
- -5.18%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 38.60%
- 6M
- 34.63%
- 1Y
- 63.22%
- 3Y*
- 23.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
PXH
- 1D
- -2.63%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 11.08%
- 1Y
- 28.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
PIE vs. PXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 38.60% | 25.98% | -0.27% | 13.71% | -28.77% | 14.30% | 21.23% | 26.11% | -22.04% | 41.80% |
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 10.82% | 31.44% | 12.09% | 13.93% | -15.18% | 8.31% | -1.91% | 16.77% | -8.68% | 26.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIE and PXH is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007 | 0.81 |
The correlation between PIE and PXH shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (3 years) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PIE vs. PXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PIE
PXH
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Technology
PIE
PXH
Industrials
PIE
PXH
Financial Services
PIE
PXH
Energy
PIE
PXH
Healthcare
PIE
PXH
Real Estate
PIE
PXH
Basic Materials
PIE
PXH
Consumer Cyclical
PIE
PXH
Communication Services
PIE
PXH
Utilities
PIE
PXH
Consumer Defensive
PIE
PXH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIE vs. PXH — Risk / Return Rank
PIE
PXH
PIE vs. PXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIE | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.33 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.44 | 2.84 | +3.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.03 | 10.04 | +9.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIE vs. PXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than PXH's maximum drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and PXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIE | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.98% | -63.63% | -9.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.87% | -10.24% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.69% | -17.72% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.32% | -29.59% | -10.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.32% | -40.42% | +0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.18% | -4.91% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.01% | -16.82% | -9.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 2.89% | +0.28% |
Volatility
PIE vs. PXH - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a higher volatility of 13.28% compared to Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) at 6.78%. This indicates that PIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIE | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.28% | 6.78% | +6.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.21% | 13.45% | +7.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.30% | 16.11% | +8.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 17.93% | +2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 19.96% | +1.61% |
PIE vs. PXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PXH's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIE vs. PXH - Dividend Comparison
PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than PXH's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.74% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 4.34% | 4.02% | 4.43% | 4.84% | 5.33% | 4.69% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 3.30% | 2.74% | 1.97% | 3.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIE and PXH have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIE has higher volatility (13.28%) compared to PXH (6.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs PXH's -63.63%.
On 10-year performance, PXH leads with 10.53% vs 10.46% for PIE. On fees, PXH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PXH has been the lower-risk option at 6.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PXH has performed better with a 10.53% return vs 10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
PXH has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 1.74% for PIE.
PIE is categorized as Momentum, while PXH is Emerging Markets Equities. PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.50% for PXH.
PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIE and PXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer