PortfoliosLab logo
DBEM vs. FEMKX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DBEM and FEMKX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

DBEM vs. FEMKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
42.26%
69.24%
DBEM
FEMKX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DBEM:

0.59

FEMKX:

0.37

Sortino Ratio

DBEM:

0.95

FEMKX:

0.66

Omega Ratio

DBEM:

1.12

FEMKX:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

DBEM:

0.56

FEMKX:

0.23

Martin Ratio

DBEM:

2.14

FEMKX:

1.14

Ulcer Index

DBEM:

5.00%

FEMKX:

6.37%

Daily Std Dev

DBEM:

18.10%

FEMKX:

19.66%

Max Drawdown

DBEM:

-33.50%

FEMKX:

-71.06%

Current Drawdown

DBEM:

-8.49%

FEMKX:

-20.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEM achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly higher than FEMKX's 3.12% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEM has underperformed FEMKX with an annualized return of 3.52%, while FEMKX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.51% annualized return.


DBEM

YTD

3.66%

1M

7.99%

6M

1.16%

1Y

7.89%

5Y*

7.43%

10Y*

3.52%

FEMKX

YTD

3.12%

1M

11.56%

6M

-1.43%

1Y

3.85%

5Y*

6.09%

10Y*

5.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DBEM vs. FEMKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMKX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FEMKX: current value is 0.88%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FEMKX: 0.88%
Expense ratio chart for DBEM: current value is 0.66%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
DBEM: 0.66%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DBEM vs. FEMKX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DBEM is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DBEM is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DBEM is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DBEM is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DBEM is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DBEM is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMKX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FEMKX is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FEMKX is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FEMKX is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FEMKX is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FEMKX is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FEMKX is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DBEM vs. FEMKX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for DBEM, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
DBEM: 0.59
FEMKX: 0.37
The chart of Sortino ratio for DBEM, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
DBEM: 0.95
FEMKX: 0.66
The chart of Omega ratio for DBEM, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
DBEM: 1.12
FEMKX: 1.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for DBEM, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
DBEM: 0.56
FEMKX: 0.23
The chart of Martin ratio for DBEM, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
DBEM: 2.14
FEMKX: 1.14

The current DBEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the FEMKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEM and FEMKX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.59
0.37
DBEM
FEMKX

Dividends

DBEM vs. FEMKX - Dividend Comparison

DBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than FEMKX's 0.63% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
2.39%2.48%2.55%2.65%1.77%1.74%2.59%2.85%1.51%1.59%3.49%2.08%
FEMKX
Fidelity Emerging Markets
0.63%0.65%1.11%0.77%1.06%0.20%1.71%0.81%0.49%0.67%0.51%1.24%

Drawdowns

DBEM vs. FEMKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEM drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, smaller than the maximum FEMKX drawdown of -71.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEM and FEMKX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-8.49%
-20.89%
DBEM
FEMKX

Volatility

DBEM vs. FEMKX - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) have volatilities of 11.28% and 11.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
11.28%
11.04%
DBEM
FEMKX