PIE vs. EEM
PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) and EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PIE is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while EEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PIE returned 11.05%/yr vs 10.51%/yr for EEM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PIE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for EEM.
Performance
PIE vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIE achieves a 46.17% return, which is significantly higher than EEM's 30.84% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PIE having a 11.05% annualized return and EEM not far behind at 10.51%.
PIE
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 8.46%
- YTD
- 46.17%
- 6M
- 42.19%
- 1Y
- 75.16%
- 3Y*
- 25.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
EEM
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 8.65%
- YTD
- 30.84%
- 6M
- 32.53%
- 1Y
- 56.71%
- 3Y*
- 24.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
PIE vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 46.17% | 25.98% | -0.27% | 13.71% | -28.77% | 14.30% | 21.23% | 26.11% | -22.04% | 41.80% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 30.84% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIE and EEM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007 | 0.85 |
The correlation between PIE and EEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
PIE vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PIE
EEM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Technology
PIE
EEM
Industrials
PIE
EEM
Financial Services
PIE
EEM
Energy
PIE
EEM
Healthcare
PIE
EEM
Real Estate
PIE
EEM
Basic Materials
PIE
EEM
Consumer Cyclical
PIE
EEM
Communication Services
PIE
EEM
Utilities
PIE
EEM
Consumer Defensive
PIE
EEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIE vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank
PIE
EEM
PIE vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIE | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.48 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.65 | 4.22 | +3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.94 | 15.52 | +8.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIE vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than EEM's maximum drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and EEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIE | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.98% | -66.43% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.87% | -13.52% | +3.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.69% | -17.29% | -11.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.32% | -37.49% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.32% | -39.82% | -0.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.02% | -15.99% | -10.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 3.66% | -0.51% |
Volatility
PIE vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a higher volatility of 11.96% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) at 10.95%. This indicates that PIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIE | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.96% | 10.95% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.46% | 19.83% | +0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.73% | 22.04% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 19.39% | +1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 20.69% | +0.88% |
PIE vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIE vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than EEM's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.56% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 2.26% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIE and EEM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIE has higher volatility (11.96%) compared to EEM (10.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs EEM's -66.43%.
On 10-year performance, PIE leads with 11.05% vs 10.51% for EEM. On fees, EEM is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, EEM has been the lower-risk option at 10.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PIE has performed better with a 11.05% return vs 10.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEM is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
PIE has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 1.56% for EEM.
PIE is categorized as Momentum, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.72% for EEM.
PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIE and EEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer