PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DBEM vs. IEFA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DBEM and IEFA is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

DBEM vs. IEFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
52.23%
122.10%
DBEM
IEFA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DBEM:

0.65

IEFA:

0.46

Sortino Ratio

DBEM:

0.99

IEFA:

0.73

Omega Ratio

DBEM:

1.12

IEFA:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

DBEM:

0.48

IEFA:

0.62

Martin Ratio

DBEM:

2.21

IEFA:

1.44

Ulcer Index

DBEM:

4.35%

IEFA:

4.39%

Daily Std Dev

DBEM:

14.86%

IEFA:

13.65%

Max Drawdown

DBEM:

-33.50%

IEFA:

-34.79%

Current Drawdown

DBEM:

-8.83%

IEFA:

-3.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEM achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly lower than IEFA's 8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEM has underperformed IEFA with an annualized return of 3.72%, while IEFA has yielded a comparatively higher 5.55% annualized return.


DBEM

YTD

3.28%

1M

2.37%

6M

-2.84%

1Y

9.41%

5Y*

9.09%

10Y*

3.72%

IEFA

YTD

8.15%

1M

-0.46%

6M

-0.06%

1Y

7.08%

5Y*

13.21%

10Y*

5.55%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DBEM vs. IEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than IEFA's 0.07% expense ratio.


DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
Expense ratio chart for DBEM: current value is 0.66%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
DBEM: 0.66%
Expense ratio chart for IEFA: current value is 0.07%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
IEFA: 0.07%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DBEM vs. IEFA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DBEM is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DBEM is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DBEM is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DBEM is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DBEM is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DBEM is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IEFA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IEFA is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IEFA is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IEFA is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IEFA is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IEFA is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IEFA is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DBEM vs. IEFA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DBEM, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00
DBEM: 0.65
IEFA: 0.46
The chart of Sortino ratio for DBEM, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
DBEM: 0.99
IEFA: 0.73
The chart of Omega ratio for DBEM, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
DBEM: 1.12
IEFA: 1.09
The chart of Calmar ratio for DBEM, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00
DBEM: 0.48
IEFA: 0.62
The chart of Martin ratio for DBEM, currently valued at 2.21, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00
DBEM: 2.21
IEFA: 1.44

The current DBEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the IEFA Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEM and IEFA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.65
0.46
DBEM
IEFA

Dividends

DBEM vs. IEFA - Dividend Comparison

DBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than IEFA's 3.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
2.40%2.48%2.55%2.65%1.77%1.74%2.59%2.85%1.51%1.59%3.49%2.08%
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
3.21%3.47%3.20%2.70%3.32%1.90%3.18%3.46%2.57%2.96%2.63%3.10%

Drawdowns

DBEM vs. IEFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEM drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, roughly equal to the maximum IEFA drawdown of -34.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEM and IEFA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-8.83%
-3.36%
DBEM
IEFA

Volatility

DBEM vs. IEFA - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) have volatilities of 4.75% and 4.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
4.75%
4.95%
DBEM
IEFA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab