DBAW vs. EFAS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DBAW (Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBAW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index, while EFAS is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBAW returned 11.27%/yr vs 14.40%/yr for EFAS. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DBAW charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

DBAW vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBAW achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 21.51% return.

DBAW

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -0.39%
• 6M: 9.89%
• YTD: 15.50%
• 1Y: 31.91%
• 3Y*: 20.32%
• 5Y*: 11.27%
• 10Y*: 10.99%
• ALL TIME*: 9.39%

EFAS

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 7.15%
• 6M: 15.12%
• YTD: 21.51%
• 1Y: 33.05%
• 3Y*: 26.08%
• 5Y*: 14.40%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	$1.39M	$1.84M	$1.16M
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	$903.64K	$563.02K	$421.49K

DBAW vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	15.50%	26.47%	14.35%	16.26%	-13.35%	13.08%	7.44%	22.96%	-10.38%	18.79%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	21.51%	46.83%	3.07%	14.65%	-8.00%	12.75%	-5.42%	14.60%	-11.60%	22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between DBAW and EFAS is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2016	0.63

The correlation between DBAW and EFAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DBAW vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DBAW	EFAS
Financial Services	23.9%	35.3%
Technology	23.5%	0.1%
Industrials	13.9%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	1.9%
Healthcare	6.9%	0.1%
Basic Materials	6.3%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	7.7%
Communication Services	4.7%	8.9%
Energy	4.4%	10.3%
Utilities	3.0%	11.8%
Real Estate	1.3%	15.6%

Return for Risk

DBAW vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBAW

DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 87
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 87

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 95
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 94
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBAW vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DBAW	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	3.03	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	4.22	-1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.53	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	6.26	-2.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.08	15.38	-2.30

DBAW vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBAW Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBAW and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DBAW vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBAW drawdown since its inception was -31.44%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBAW and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBAW	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.44%	-44.38%	+12.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.00%	-5.30%	-3.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.11%	-11.84%	-2.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.87%	-28.81%	+10.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.24%	-0.12%	-3.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.97%	-6.98%	+2.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	2.15%	+0.30%

Volatility

DBAW vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.45%. This indicates that DBAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBAW	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	2.45%	+2.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.92%	8.65%	+4.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.66%	10.98%	+3.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.05%	15.52%	-1.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.22%	18.23%	-3.01%

DBAW vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBAW has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBAW vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

DBAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than EFAS's 4.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	1.70%	3.83%	1.70%	3.45%	8.81%	2.05%	2.08%	2.91%	2.93%	2.41%	1.99%	5.74%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.49%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBAW and EFAS in my portfolio?

DBAW and EFAS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBAW or EFAS?

DBAW has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to EFAS (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBAW dropped -31.44% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

Which ETF is better, DBAW or EFAS?

On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 14.40% vs 11.27% for DBAW. On fees, DBAW is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBAW or EFAS?

Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 14.40% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBAW or EFAS?

DBAW is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EFAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBAW or EFAS?

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 1.70% for DBAW.

What is the main difference between DBAW and EFAS?

DBAW is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EFAS is Dividend. DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index, while EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DBAW and 0.55% for EFAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.