PortfoliosLab logo
DBAW vs. MDIJX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DBAW and MDIJX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

DBAW vs. MDIJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DBAW:

0.59

MDIJX:

0.96

Sortino Ratio

DBAW:

0.80

MDIJX:

1.25

Omega Ratio

DBAW:

1.12

MDIJX:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

DBAW:

0.59

MDIJX:

0.99

Martin Ratio

DBAW:

2.54

MDIJX:

2.98

Ulcer Index

DBAW:

3.27%

MDIJX:

4.17%

Daily Std Dev

DBAW:

16.26%

MDIJX:

14.33%

Max Drawdown

DBAW:

-31.44%

MDIJX:

-55.98%

Current Drawdown

DBAW:

-1.15%

MDIJX:

-0.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBAW achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly lower than MDIJX's 13.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DBAW having a 6.82% annualized return and MDIJX not far ahead at 6.97%.


DBAW

YTD

6.39%

1M

3.55%

6M

6.15%

1Y

9.03%

3Y*

12.03%

5Y*

12.54%

10Y*

6.82%

MDIJX

YTD

13.75%

1M

5.52%

6M

11.59%

1Y

13.10%

3Y*

10.94%

5Y*

10.41%

10Y*

6.97%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DBAW vs. MDIJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBAW has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than MDIJX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DBAW vs. MDIJX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBAW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DBAW is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DBAW is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DBAW is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DBAW is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DBAW is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DBAW is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MDIJX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MDIJX is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MDIJX is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MDIJX is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MDIJX is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MDIJX is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MDIJX is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DBAW vs. MDIJX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DBAW Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the MDIJX Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBAW and MDIJX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

DBAW vs. MDIJX - Dividend Comparison

DBAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than MDIJX's 3.08% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
1.60%1.70%3.45%13.44%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%7.59%
MDIJX
MFS International Diversification Fund
3.08%3.50%4.14%2.64%2.70%1.64%2.50%3.14%1.63%2.19%1.69%1.48%

Drawdowns

DBAW vs. MDIJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBAW drawdown since its inception was -31.44%, smaller than the maximum MDIJX drawdown of -55.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBAW and MDIJX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

DBAW vs. MDIJX - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) at 1.89%. This indicates that DBAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDIJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...