DBAW vs. HFXI
DBAW (Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF) and HFXI (IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DBAW tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index while HFXI tracks the FTSE Developed ex North America 50% Hedged to USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBAW returned 12.30%/yr vs 12.35%/yr for HFXI. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBAW charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for HFXI.
Performance
DBAW vs. HFXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DBAW having a 19.37% return and HFXI slightly higher at 20.17%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DBAW having a 12.30% annualized return and HFXI not far ahead at 12.35%.
DBAW
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 19.37%
- 6M
- 19.97%
- 1Y
- 39.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.59%
- 5Y*
- 12.02%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
HFXI
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 20.17%
- 6M
- 20.99%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 21.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
DBAW vs. HFXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF | 19.37% | 26.47% | 14.35% | 16.26% | -13.35% | 13.08% | 7.44% | 22.96% | -10.38% | 18.79% |
HFXI IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF | 20.17% | 30.10% | 7.58% | 19.56% | -10.71% | 13.96% | 6.88% | 23.67% | -12.69% | 22.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBAW and HFXI is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2015 | 0.87 |
The correlation between DBAW and HFXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
DBAW vs. HFXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBAW
HFXI
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DBAW
HFXI
Technology
DBAW
HFXI
Industrials
DBAW
HFXI
Consumer Cyclical
DBAW
HFXI
Basic Materials
DBAW
HFXI
Healthcare
DBAW
HFXI
Consumer Defensive
DBAW
HFXI
Communication Services
DBAW
HFXI
Energy
DBAW
HFXI
Utilities
DBAW
HFXI
Real Estate
DBAW
HFXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBAW vs. HFXI — Risk / Return Rank
DBAW
HFXI
DBAW vs. HFXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBAW | HFXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.49 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.46 | 3.73 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.16 | 14.66 | +3.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBAW vs. HFXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBAW drawdown since its inception was -31.44%, roughly equal to the maximum HFXI drawdown of -32.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBAW and HFXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBAW | HFXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.44% | -32.42% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.00% | -10.84% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.11% | -13.52% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -22.35% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.44% | -32.42% | +0.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -5.44% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 2.75% | -0.54% |
Volatility
DBAW vs. HFXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) is 5.66%, while IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that DBAW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBAW | HFXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 6.27% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 13.62% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.75% | 15.65% | -1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 15.05% | -1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.30% | 16.65% | -1.35% |
DBAW vs. HFXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBAW has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than HFXI's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBAW vs. HFXI - Dividend Comparison
DBAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than HFXI's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF | 1.64% | 3.83% | 1.70% | 3.45% | 8.81% | 2.05% | 2.08% | 2.91% | 2.93% | 2.41% | 1.99% | 5.74% |
HFXI IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF | 3.22% | 4.19% | 2.68% | 2.49% | 4.65% | 3.10% | 2.00% | 3.19% | 4.33% | 2.56% | 2.71% | 0.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, DBAW and HFXI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HFXI has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to DBAW (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBAW dropped -31.44% vs HFXI's -32.42%.
On 10-year performance, HFXI leads with 12.35% vs 12.30% for DBAW. On fees, HFXI is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DBAW has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HFXI has performed better with a 12.35% return vs 12.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HFXI is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.
HFXI has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.64% for DBAW.
DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index, while HFXI tracks FTSE Developed ex North America 50% Hedged to USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DBAW and 0.20% for HFXI.
DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBAW and HFXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer