PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBAW vs. HFXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBAW vs. HFXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DBAW having a 19.37% return and HFXI slightly higher at 20.17%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DBAW having a 12.30% annualized return and HFXI not far ahead at 12.35%.


DBAW

1D
0.47%
1M
5.47%
YTD
19.37%
6M
19.97%
1Y
39.95%
3Y*
22.59%
5Y*
12.02%
10Y*
12.30%

HFXI

1D
0.08%
1M
5.03%
YTD
20.17%
6M
20.99%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBAW vs. HFXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
19.37%26.47%14.35%16.26%-13.35%13.08%7.44%22.96%-10.38%18.79%
HFXI
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF
20.17%30.10%7.58%19.56%-10.71%13.96%6.88%23.67%-12.69%22.68%

Correlation

The correlation between DBAW and HFXI is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2015

0.87

The correlation between DBAW and HFXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBAW vs. HFXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBAW
HFXI

Financial Services

23.2%
22.8%

Technology

22.4%
14.6%

Industrials

14.3%
20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
7.7%

Basic Materials

6.9%
5.9%

Healthcare

6.8%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
6.3%

Communication Services

4.9%
3.5%

Energy

4.8%
3.6%

Utilities

2.9%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.4%
2.5%

Financial Services

DBAW
23.2%
HFXI
22.8%

Technology

DBAW
22.4%
HFXI
14.6%

Industrials

DBAW
14.3%
HFXI
20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DBAW
7.6%
HFXI
7.7%

Basic Materials

DBAW
6.9%
HFXI
5.9%

Healthcare

DBAW
6.8%
HFXI
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

DBAW
5.0%
HFXI
6.3%

Communication Services

DBAW
4.9%
HFXI
3.5%

Energy

DBAW
4.8%
HFXI
3.6%

Utilities

DBAW
2.9%
HFXI
3.6%

Real Estate

DBAW
1.4%
HFXI
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBAW vs. HFXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

HFXI
HFXI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HFXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFXI Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HFXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFXI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBAW vs. HFXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBAWHFXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.49

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

3.73

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.16

14.66

+3.50

DBAW vs. HFXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBAW Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the HFXI Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBAW and HFXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBAW vs. HFXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBAW drawdown since its inception was -31.44%, roughly equal to the maximum HFXI drawdown of -32.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBAW and HFXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBAWHFXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.44%

-32.42%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-10.84%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.11%

-13.52%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-22.35%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

-32.42%

+0.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-5.44%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.75%

-0.54%

Volatility

DBAW vs. HFXI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) is 5.66%, while IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that DBAW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBAWHFXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

6.27%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

13.62%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.75%

15.65%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

15.05%

-1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.30%

16.65%

-1.35%

DBAW vs. HFXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBAW has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than HFXI's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBAW vs. HFXI - Dividend Comparison

DBAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than HFXI's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
1.64%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%
HFXI
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF
3.22%4.19%2.68%2.49%4.65%3.10%2.00%3.19%4.33%2.56%2.71%0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DBAW and HFXI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HFXI has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to DBAW (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBAW dropped -31.44% vs HFXI's -32.42%.

On 10-year performance, HFXI leads with 12.35% vs 12.30% for DBAW. On fees, HFXI is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DBAW has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HFXI has performed better with a 12.35% return vs 12.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HFXI is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

HFXI has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.64% for DBAW.

DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index, while HFXI tracks FTSE Developed ex North America 50% Hedged to USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DBAW and 0.20% for HFXI.

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBAW and HFXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer