PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBAW vs. HAWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBAW vs. HAWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DBAW having a 19.37% return and HAWX slightly higher at 19.66%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DBAW having a 12.30% annualized return and HAWX not far ahead at 12.83%.


DBAW

1D
0.47%
1M
5.47%
YTD
19.37%
6M
19.97%
1Y
39.95%
3Y*
22.59%
5Y*
12.02%
10Y*
12.30%

HAWX

1D
0.64%
1M
5.80%
YTD
19.66%
6M
20.07%
1Y
40.65%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
12.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBAW vs. HAWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
19.37%26.47%14.35%16.26%-13.35%13.08%7.44%22.96%-10.38%18.79%
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
19.66%26.24%14.88%17.05%-8.59%13.40%6.92%22.75%-9.77%19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DBAW and HAWX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015

0.86

The correlation between DBAW and HAWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 0.97 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DBAW vs. HAWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBAW
HAWX

Financial Services

23.2%
23.2%

Technology

22.4%
22.5%

Industrials

14.3%
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
7.5%

Basic Materials

6.9%
6.9%

Healthcare

6.8%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.8%

Communication Services

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

4.8%
4.8%

Utilities

2.9%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.4%

Financial Services

DBAW
23.2%
HAWX
23.2%

Technology

DBAW
22.4%
HAWX
22.5%

Industrials

DBAW
14.3%
HAWX
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DBAW
7.6%
HAWX
7.5%

Basic Materials

DBAW
6.9%
HAWX
6.9%

Healthcare

DBAW
6.8%
HAWX
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

DBAW
5.0%
HAWX
4.8%

Communication Services

DBAW
4.9%
HAWX
4.9%

Energy

DBAW
4.8%
HAWX
4.8%

Utilities

DBAW
2.9%
HAWX
3.0%

Real Estate

DBAW
1.4%
HAWX
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBAW vs. HAWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

HAWX
HAWX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBAW vs. HAWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBAWHAWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.56

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

4.35

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.16

18.01

+0.16

DBAW vs. HAWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBAW Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the HAWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBAW and HAWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBAW vs. HAWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBAW drawdown since its inception was -31.44%, roughly equal to the maximum HAWX drawdown of -30.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBAW and HAWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBAWHAWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.44%

-30.63%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-9.39%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.11%

-13.30%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-17.47%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

-30.63%

-0.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-4.27%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.26%

-0.05%

Volatility

DBAW vs. HAWX - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) have volatilities of 5.66% and 5.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBAWHAWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

5.92%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

12.26%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.75%

13.98%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

13.54%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.30%

15.24%

+0.06%

DBAW vs. HAWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBAW has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than HAWX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBAW vs. HAWX - Dividend Comparison

DBAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than HAWX's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
1.64%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.34%2.80%3.31%2.95%16.94%2.63%2.00%3.23%2.51%2.40%2.49%3.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DBAW and HAWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HAWX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to DBAW (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBAW dropped -31.44% vs HAWX's -30.63%.

On 10-year performance, HAWX leads with 12.83% vs 12.30% for DBAW. On fees, HAWX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DBAW has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HAWX has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 12.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HAWX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

HAWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.64% for DBAW.

DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index, while HAWX tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA 100% Hedged to USD. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DBAW and 0.35% for HAWX.

HAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBAW and HAWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer