CWB vs. MNDO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CWB (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF) is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Convertibles Liquid Bond, while MNDO (MIND C.T.I. Ltd) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CWB returned 12.98%/yr vs 2.14%/yr for MNDO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CWB vs. MNDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWB achieves a 22.11% return, which is significantly higher than MNDO's -17.39% return. Over the past 10 years, CWB has outperformed MNDO with an annualized return of 12.98%, while MNDO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.14% annualized return.

CWB

• 1D: -1.97%
• 1M: 2.60%
• YTD: 22.11%
• 6M: 20.22%
• 1Y: 36.00%
• 3Y*: 18.53%
• 5Y*: 6.58%
• 10Y*: 12.98%

MNDO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.26%
• YTD: -17.39%
• 6M: -18.10%
• 1Y: -29.37%
• 3Y*: -15.13%
• 5Y*: -14.24%
• 10Y*: 2.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWB vs. MNDO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF	22.11%	16.61%	10.06%	14.49%	-20.81%	2.18%	53.39%	22.39%	-2.00%	15.69%
MNDO MIND C.T.I. Ltd	-17.39%	-34.77%	12.86%	4.21%	-26.48%	30.73%	21.80%	18.54%	-7.49%	26.62%

Correlation

The correlation between CWB and MNDO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2009	0.16

Return for Risk

CWB vs. MNDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWB

CWB Risk / Return Rank: 80
CWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CWB Omega Ratio Rank: 76
CWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CWB Martin Ratio Rank: 83

MNDO

MNDO Risk / Return Rank: 12
MNDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
MNDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
MNDO Omega Ratio Rank: 12
MNDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
MNDO Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWB vs. MNDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CWB	MNDO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	-0.79	+3.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	-1.05	+4.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	0.87	+0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.81	-0.73	+5.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.23	-1.26	+17.50

CWB vs. MNDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWB Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the MNDO Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWB and MNDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CWB vs. MNDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWB drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum MNDO drawdown of -94.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWB and MNDO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CWB	MNDO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.06%	-94.28%	+62.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.52%	-40.53%	+33.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.92%	-54.63%	+42.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.41%	-64.04%	+35.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.06%	-64.04%	+31.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.26%	-61.19%	+58.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-46.73%	+40.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	23.26%	-21.04%

Volatility

CWB vs. MNDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) is 6.78%, while MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) has a volatility of 14.94%. This indicates that CWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CWB	MNDO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.78%	14.94%	-8.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.74%	25.43%	-12.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.29%	37.14%	-21.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.21%	28.56%	-15.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.57%	26.70%	-12.13%

Dividends

CWB vs. MNDO - Dividend Comparison

CWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while MNDO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF	1.37%	1.69%	1.85%	1.97%	2.21%	1.97%	2.34%	3.03%	6.17%	4.25%	4.60%	7.52%
MNDO MIND C.T.I. Ltd	0.00%	19.13%	12.15%	12.24%	12.38%	8.37%	9.27%	10.79%	13.16%	11.55%	10.98%	11.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CWB and MNDO in my portfolio?

CWB and MNDO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CWB or MNDO?

MNDO has higher volatility (14.94%) compared to CWB (6.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWB dropped -32.06% vs MNDO's -94.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.