PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MNDO vs. CLOZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MNDO and CLOZ is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

MNDO vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
6.41%
6.76%
MNDO
CLOZ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MNDO:

0.41

CLOZ:

6.82

Sortino Ratio

MNDO:

0.72

CLOZ:

9.58

Omega Ratio

MNDO:

1.09

CLOZ:

3.66

Calmar Ratio

MNDO:

0.23

CLOZ:

8.47

Martin Ratio

MNDO:

1.70

CLOZ:

54.15

Ulcer Index

MNDO:

4.52%

CLOZ:

0.22%

Daily Std Dev

MNDO:

18.83%

CLOZ:

1.72%

Max Drawdown

MNDO:

-94.29%

CLOZ:

-2.70%

Current Drawdown

MNDO:

-27.43%

CLOZ:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNDO achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than CLOZ's 1.31% return.


MNDO

YTD

0.76%

1M

-1.49%

6M

6.42%

1Y

4.65%

5Y*

5.50%

10Y*

5.66%

CLOZ

YTD

1.31%

1M

1.05%

6M

6.77%

1Y

11.61%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MNDO vs. CLOZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNDO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MNDO is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MNDO is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MNDO is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MNDO is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MNDO is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MNDO is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MNDO vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MNDO, currently valued at 0.41, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.416.82
The chart of Sortino ratio for MNDO, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.729.58
The chart of Omega ratio for MNDO, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.093.66
The chart of Calmar ratio for MNDO, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.818.47
The chart of Martin ratio for MNDO, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.7054.15
MNDO
CLOZ

The current MNDO Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 6.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNDO and CLOZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.006.007.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.41
6.82
MNDO
CLOZ

Dividends

MNDO vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

MNDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.06%, more than CLOZ's 8.79% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
12.06%12.15%12.24%12.38%8.37%9.27%10.78%13.16%11.55%10.98%11.86%6.11%
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
8.79%9.09%8.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MNDO vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNDO drawdown since its inception was -94.29%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -2.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDO and CLOZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.57%
0
MNDO
CLOZ

Volatility

MNDO vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 0.23%. This indicates that MNDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.95%
0.23%
MNDO
CLOZ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab