PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNDO vs. VMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNDO vs. VMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) and Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNDO achieves a -17.39% return, which is significantly lower than VMBS's 0.92% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDO has outperformed VMBS with an annualized return of 2.14%, while VMBS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.35% annualized return.


MNDO

1D
0.00%
1M
3.26%
YTD
-17.39%
6M
-18.10%
1Y
-29.37%
3Y*
-15.13%
5Y*
-14.24%
10Y*
2.14%

VMBS

1D
0.09%
1M
0.63%
YTD
0.92%
6M
1.02%
1Y
6.00%
3Y*
4.52%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*
1.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNDO vs. VMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
-17.39%-34.77%12.86%4.21%-26.48%30.73%21.80%18.54%-7.49%26.62%
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.92%8.36%1.70%5.34%-11.90%-1.28%3.76%6.19%0.91%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between MNDO and VMBS is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNDO vs. VMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNDO
MNDO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MNDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNDO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MNDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNDO Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

VMBS
VMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNDO vs. VMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) and Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNDOVMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.25

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

2.24

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.26

7.12

-8.38

MNDO vs. VMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNDO Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the VMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNDO and VMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNDO vs. VMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNDO drawdown since its inception was -94.28%, which is greater than VMBS's maximum drawdown of -17.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDO and VMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNDOVMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.28%

-17.47%

-76.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.53%

-2.68%

-37.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.63%

-7.65%

-46.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.04%

-17.12%

-46.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.04%

-17.47%

-46.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.19%

-1.07%

-60.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.73%

-2.49%

-44.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.26%

0.84%

+22.42%

Volatility

MNDO vs. VMBS - Volatility Comparison

MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) has a higher volatility of 14.94% compared to Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) at 1.19%. This indicates that MNDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNDOVMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.94%

1.19%

+13.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.43%

3.27%

+22.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.14%

4.30%

+32.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.56%

6.78%

+21.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.70%

5.41%

+21.29%

Dividends

MNDO vs. VMBS - Dividend Comparison

MNDO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
0.00%19.13%12.15%12.24%12.38%8.37%9.27%10.79%13.16%11.55%10.98%11.86%
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
4.17%4.20%3.94%3.31%2.35%1.02%2.01%2.77%2.72%2.16%2.10%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNDO and VMBS have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNDO has higher volatility (14.94%) compared to VMBS (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNDO dropped -94.28% vs VMBS's -17.47%.

VMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNDO and VMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer