CWB vs. CCD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CWB (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF) is Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Convertibles Liquid Bond, while CCD (Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CWB returned 11.70%/yr vs 13.45%/yr for CCD. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.

Performance

CWB vs. CCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWB achieves a 15.00% return, which is significantly lower than CCD's 24.58% return. Over the past 10 years, CWB has underperformed CCD with an annualized return of 11.70%, while CCD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.45% annualized return.

CWB

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -2.42%
• 6M: 9.82%
• YTD: 15.00%
• 1Y: 23.27%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: 5.59%
• 10Y*: 11.70%
• ALL TIME*: 11.55%

CCD

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -2.05%
• 6M: 15.65%
• YTD: 24.58%
• 1Y: 34.45%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: 13.45%
• ALL TIME*: 10.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCD Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund	$1.59M	$1.81M	$2.06M
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF	$56.06M	$68.05M	$91.74M

CWB vs. CCD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF	15.00%	16.61%	10.06%	14.49%	-20.81%	2.18%	53.39%	22.39%	-2.00%	15.69%
CCD Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund	24.58%	-4.26%	35.89%	7.98%	-28.00%	20.33%	45.75%	41.60%	-9.64%	26.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CWB and CCD is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2015	0.62

The correlation between CWB and CCD shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CWB vs. CCD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CWB

CWB Risk / Return Rank: 55
CWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
CWB Omega Ratio Rank: 52
CWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
CWB Martin Ratio Rank: 60

CCD

CCD Risk / Return Rank: 87
CCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CCD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CCD Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CWB vs. CCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CWB	CCD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.66	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	2.30	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.29	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	2.94	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.11	12.19	-5.09

CWB vs. CCD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWB Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the CCD Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWB and CCD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CWB vs. CCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWB drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum CCD drawdown of -55.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWB and CCD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CWB	CCD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.06%	-55.42%	+23.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.08%	-11.08%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.92%	-22.28%	+10.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.41%	-37.54%	+9.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.06%	-55.42%	+23.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.95%	-3.82%	-4.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-11.69%	+5.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	2.68%	+0.40%

Volatility

CWB vs. CCD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) is 5.90%, while Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) has a volatility of 6.69%. This indicates that CWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CWB	CCD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.90%	6.69%	-0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.92%	16.44%	-2.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.61%	19.58%	-2.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.46%	20.51%	-7.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.69%	25.87%	-11.18%

Dividends

CWB vs. CCD - Dividend Comparison

CWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than CCD's 9.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCD Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund	9.46%	11.22%	9.63%	11.83%	11.42%	7.43%	7.11%	8.93%	12.21%	9.99%	11.43%	7.40%
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF	1.33%	1.69%	1.85%	1.97%	2.21%	1.97%	2.34%	3.03%	6.17%	4.25%	4.60%	7.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CWB and CCD in my portfolio?

CWB and CCD have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CWB or CCD?

CCD has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to CWB (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWB dropped -32.06% vs CCD's -55.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.